UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.)

 

¨ 

☒ 

Filed by the Registrant

¨ 

☐ 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

¨ 

☒ 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨ 

☐ 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

¨ 

☐ 

Definitive Additional Materials

¨ 

☐ 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to 167; 240.14a-12

 

Ampco–Pittsburgh Corporation

 

Ampco–Pittsburgh Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Itsin its Charter)

 

 

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☒ 

No fee required.

 

¨ 

☐ 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

 

(1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

(2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

(3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

 

(4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

 

(5) 

Total fee paid:

 

 

¨ 

☐ 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

¨ 

☐ 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

(1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

 

(2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

 

(3) 

Filing Party:

 

 

 

(4) 

Date Filed:


 


LOGO

726 Bell Avenue, Suite 301

Carnegie, Pennsylvania 15106

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD THURSDAY, MAY 5, 20169, 2019

 

TTOTHE SHAREHOLDERSOF

AAMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (“Ampco” or the “Corporation”) will be held in the Carnegie Room, 3rd Floor, The Duquesne Club, 325 Sixth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on Thursday, May 5, 20169, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.,AM, Eastern Time, for the following purposes:

 

1.

to elect a class of fourtwo directors for a term that expires in 2019;2022;

 

2.

to consider and vote on an amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares;

2.

3.

to hold a non-binding,an advisory vote to approve our executive compensation (the “Say-on-Pay” vote);compensation;

 

3.

4.

to act upon a proposal to approve the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan;

4.to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2016;2019; and

 

5.

to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Shareholders of record on March 11, 201612, 2019, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.

 

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Maria V. Trainor,

Vice President, General

Counsel and Secretary

 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

March 23, 2016___, 2019

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for

the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to Be Held on May 5, 20169, 2019

The proxy statement and the annual report of the Corporation are available at

http://www.ampcopittsburgh.com/financial.html.investors.html.

 

All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Your vote is important, and, whether or not you expect to attend in person, it is requested that you PROMPTLY fill in, sign, and return the enclosed proxy card or follow the internet or telephone voting instructions included on the proxy card.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proxy Statement

Page

1

Proxy Statement Summary

1

Proxy Statement

1

Questions and Answers Regarding the Annual Meeting

5

Solicitation of Proxies

8

7

Voting Securities and Record Date

8

Required Vote

8

Election of Directors (Proposal 1)

9

NomineesNominee for Directors for a Term of Office Expiring in 20192022

9

Continuing Directors Whose Term of Office Expires in 2018In 2021

10

9

Continuing Directors Whose Term of Office Expires in 2017In 2020

10

Chairman EmeritusCorporate Governance

11

Corporate Governance

12

Corporate Governance Summary

12

11

Board Independence

13

12

Leadership Structure

13

12

Director Nominating Procedures

13

12

Non-Management Directors

14

13

Shareholder Communications with Directors

14

13

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

14

13

Director Terms

15

14

Director Emeritus

15

Annual Meeting Attendance

15

14

Board Committees and Related MattersCommittees; Director Compensation; Stock Ownership Guidelines

16

15

Summary

16

15

Audit Committee

16

15

Compensation Committee

17

16

Executive Committee

17

16

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

17

16

Director Compensation

18

16

Stock Ownership Guidelines

18

17

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

19

18

Beneficial Ownership of More Than Five Percent

18

Director and Executive Officer Stock Ownership

19

Section 16(a)16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

21

19

Proposal to Amend Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to Increase the Number of Authorized Shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock (Proposal 2)

21

Effect of Increase in Authorized Shares

21

Purposes of The Articles Amendment Proposal

21

Potential Risks Associated with The Amendment

22

Vote Required

22

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Proposal 2)3)

22

23

Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis

23

24

Compensation Overview

24

Summary Compensation Table

33

34

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

34

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

35

Retirement Benefits

36

37

Potential Payments Upon Termination, Resignation or Change Inin Control

38

Compensation Committee Report

40

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

40

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

40

Report of theThe Audit Committee

41

40

Approval of the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (Proposal 3)

43

Ratification of the Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 20162019 (Proposal 4)



51

42

Equity Compensation Plan Information

42

Shareholder Proposals For 2017for 2020

51

42

Other Matters

51

43

 


 

LOGO

 

PROXY STATEMENT

March 15, 201629, 2019

Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 5, 20169, 2019

 

Proxy Statement Summary

PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. You should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting. This proxy statement and the related proxy materials were first mailed to shareholders and made available on the internet on or about March ___, 2019.

 

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

•     Time and Date:

10:00 a.m.,AM, Eastern Time, May 5, 2016

9, 2019

•    Place:

•     Place:

The Carnegie Room, 3rd Floor

The Duquesne Club

325 Sixth Avenue

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

•    Record Date

March 11, 2016

12, 2019

•    Voting

•    Voting

Only shareholders as of the record date, March 11, 2016,12, 2019, are entitled to vote.

Your broker will NOT be able to vote your shares with respect to any of the matters presented at the meeting other than the ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm unless you give your broker specific voting instructions.

Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting in person, please cast your vote as soon as possible by:

•      Using the Internet at www.proxyvote.com;

•       Calling toll-free from the United States, U.S. territories and Canada to 1-800-690-6903; or

•      Mailing your signed proxy or voting instruction form.

•    Attending the Annual Meeting

To be admitted in person, you will be required to present a government-issued photo identification (such as a driver’s license or passport).

If you hold shares in street name, you must request a confirmation of beneficial ownership from your broker to vote in person at the meeting.

You do not need to attend the annual meeting to vote if you have properly submitted your proxy in advance of the meeting.

1

 


•    Meeting Agenda

1.     Election of fourtwo directors;

2.     Consideration of and voting on an amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares;

2.3. Non-binding, advisory vote to approve our executive compensation;

3.      Approval of the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan;

4.     Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016; 2019; and

5.  Transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Voting Matters

 

Proposals

Proposals

Board Recommendation

Election of Directors

FOR each nominee named in this

proxy statement

Amendment of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares

FOR

Non-binding, advisory vote to approve our executive compensation

FOR

Approval of the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation 2016 Omnibus Incentive PlanFOR

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20162019

FOR

 

Board Nominees

 

Name Age  

Director

Since

    Occupation  

  Experience/

  Qualification

 Independent 

Committee

Assignments

Leonard M. Carroll

  73    1996   Managing Director of Seneca Capital  Long-term financial and investment background X Audit,

Executive

Laurence E. Paul

  51    1998   Managing principal of Laurel Crown Partners  Experienced in financial management and risk assessment  

Ernest G. Siddons

  82    1981   Retired  Long-term experience in operations and financial management  Executive

J. Fredrik Strömholm

  50    2016   Founder and Partner of Altor Equity Partners AB  Experience in investment banking and financial management  

Name

 

Age

 

 

Director

Since

 

Occupation

 

Experience/

Qualification

 

Independent

 

Committee

Assignments

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

 

63

 

 

2017

 

Principal of Fessenden Associates

 

Extensive operations experience in the metals industry; many years of service as a director of companies; broad leadership experience

 

X

 

Compensation

Terry L. Dunlap

 

59

 

 

Nominated in 2019

 

Principal of Sweetwater LLC

 

Extensive operations experience in the metals industry; board service; broad leadership experience

 

X

 

Pending election, nominated to Compensation Committee

Approval of the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan

 

We are requesting the shareholders approve the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan. A new plan is necessary in order to continue to provide short and long term equity and performance awards under our Executive Compensation Program described below.

Ratification of the Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2016

2019

We are requesting that shareholders ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.2019. The table below shows the fees paid by the Corporation to Deloitte & Touche LLP in 2015.2018.

 

  2015 

 

2018

 

Audit fees(a)

  $870,026  

 

$

1,656,185

 

Audit-related fees(b)

   835,092  

 

$

2,028

 

Tax fees

   0  

Tax fees(c)

 

$

1,964

 

All other fees

   0  

 

 

 

  

 

 

Total(c)

  $1,705,118  
  

 

 

Total

 

$

1,660,177

 

2

 


(a)

Fees for audit services primarily related primarily to the audit of (1) the Corporation’s annual consolidated financial statements and its internal control over financial reporting.reporting and (2) statutory filings for the Corporation’s foreign subsidiaries.

(b)

Fees for audit-related services in 2015 primarily represent due diligence services related to potential acquisitions whereas 2014the subscription fee for Deloitte’s Authoritative Guidance.

(c)

Fees for tax services in 2018 related primarily to the audits of the Corporation’s employee benefit plansgeneral tax consultation.

(c)The Audit Committee approved all fees in the years reported.

Executive Compensation Program Highlights

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain top talent by enabling the Corporation to compete effectively for the highest quality personnel and to pay for performance by aligning compensation with the achievement of both short-term and long-term financial objectives that build shareholder value.

The 20152018 executive compensation program features a balanced mix of salary and performance-driven annual and long-term incentive award opportunities. The following chart illustrates the target compensation opportunities in 2015 for Mr. Stanik, our CEO:

LOGO

In designing our executive compensation program, we have implemented programs and policies that support our commitment to good compensation governance and that create alignment between our executives and our shareholders, as highlighted below:

The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent directors. Each member of the Compensation Committee is a “non-employee director” of the Corporation, as defined under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and an “outside director” for purposes of the corporate compensation provisions contained in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Compensation Committee conducts an annual review and approval of our compensation strategies, including a review of our compensation-related risk profile to ensure that our compensation-related risks are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.

In 2015,2018, the Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance LLC as its independent provider of compensation consulting services for decisions relating to compensation. Pay Governance was retained to identify a reasonable group of companies as a peer group to benchmark executive compensation levels and incentive plan design and to assist itthe Compensation Committee in fulfilling its responsibilities and duties.

A significant portion of each executive’s annual pay is based on objective performance metrics and, therefore, “at-risk” based on corporate performance. In addition, the equity-based portion of our executive compensation program is designed to align the interests of our executive officers and shareholders.

The Compensation Committee periodically checksreviews its compensation decisions against executive compensation at a peer group of comparably-sized manufacturing companies comparable in terms of the primary scope metric of revenue and secondary scope metrics of market cap, assets and number of employees to ensure that our executive compensation program provides competitive compensation opportunities. The same peer group is used to determine our relative performance for vesting of a portion of performance share unit awards.

The equity awards granted to our executive officers vest over multi-year periods, consistent with current practice and our retention objectives.

We have a clawback policy applicable to executive officers pursuant to which, if the Corporation is required, because of fraud or negligence, to restate financial results for any period (the “Restatement Period”) in a manner that would have adversely affected the amount of the payout of any incentive compensation awards, the Compensation Committee has the right during the three-year period following the Restatement Period to review the matter and determine what, if any, repayment executives will be required to submit.make.

We do not provide any Internal Revenue Code Section 280G excise tax gross-up rights or any other significant tax gross-up rights to our executive officers.

The compensation arrangements with our executive officers contain double- triggerdouble-trigger equity acceleration provisions in the event of a change in control.

3


 

We have a policy prohibiting “underwater” options from being repriced or replaced (either with new options or other equity awards), unless approved by our shareholders.

 

We have a policy prohibiting “underwater” options from being repriced or replaced (either with new options or other equity awards), unless approved by our shareholders.

Additional information about our compensation philosophy and program, including compensation determinations for each of our named executive officers, can be found in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”Overview” starting on page 2024 in this Proxy Statement.

We encourage you to read the entire proxy statement and to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. If you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting in person, we encourage you to submit a proxy so that your shares will be represented and voted.

 


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS REGARDINGREGARDING THE ANNUAL MEETING

Q: Why am I receiving these materials?

A: As a shareholder, we are providing these proxy materials to you in connection with our solicitation of proxies to be voted at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will take place on May 5, 2016.9, 2019. These materials were first mailed to shareholders on or about March 15, 2016.29, 2019. You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting, and you are requested to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement.

Q: What is included in these materials?

A: These materials include:

Our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting; and

Our 20152018 Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes our audited consolidated financial statements.

These materials also include the proxy/voting instruction card for the Annual Meeting.

Q: What am I being asked to vote on?

A: You are being asked to vote on the following proposals:

Proposal 1 —Election of two directors;

Proposal 1—Election of four directors;

Proposal 2 — Consideration and vote on an amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares (the “Articles Amendment Proposal”);

Proposal 2—Non-binding, advisory vote to approve our executive compensation (the “Say-on-Pay Proposal”);

Proposal 3 — Non-binding, advisory vote to approve our executive compensation (the “Say-on-Pay Proposal”);

Proposal 3—Approval of our 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan Proposal”);

Proposal 4 — Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019 (the “Deloitte Ratification Proposal”); and

Proposal 4—Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016 (the “Deloitte Ratification Proposal”); and

Such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Q: What are the voting recommendations of the Board of Directors?

A: The Board recommends the following votes:

FOR the election of the fourtwo director nominees named in this proxy statement;

FOR the Articles Amendment Proposal;

FOR the Say-on-Pay Proposal;

FOR the Incentive Plan Proposal; and

FOR the Deloitte Ratification Proposal.

Q: Will any other matters be voted on?

A: We are not aware of any other matters that will be brought before the shareholders for a vote at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter is properly brought before the meeting, your proxy will authorize each of Marliss JohnsonMichael G. McAuley and Maria Trainor (together, the “Proxies”) to vote on such matters in their discretion.

Q: How do I cast my vote?

A: If you are a shareholder of record, you may cast your vote using any of the following methods:

Via the Internet, by visiting the website “www.proxyvote.com” and following the instructions for Internet voting on your proxy/voting instruction card;

By dialing 1-800-690-6903 and following the instructions for telephone voting on your proxy/voting instruction card;


 

By dialing 1-800-690-6903 and following the instructions for telephone voting on your proxy/voting instruction card;

By completing and mailing your proxy/voting instruction card; or

By casting your vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

If you vote over the Internet, you may incur related ancillary costs, such as telephone and Internet access charges, for which you will be responsible. The telephone and Internet voting facilities for the shareholders of record of all shares will close at 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on May 4, 2016.8, 2019. The Internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate shareholders by use of a control number and to allow you to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.

If you vote by Internet or telephone or return your signed proxy/voting instruction card, your shares will be voted as you indicate. If you do not indicate how your shares are to be voted on a matter,proposal, your shares will be voted, for all matterswith respect to that proposal, in accordance with the voting recommendations of the Board of Directors.

If your shares are held in a brokerage account in your broker’s name (also known as “street name”), you should follow the instructions for voting provided by your broker or nominee. You may submit voting instructions by Internet or telephone or you may complete and mail a voting instruction card to your broker or nominee. If you provide specific voting instructions by telephone, Internet or mail, your broker or nominee will vote your shares as you have directed.

Ballots will be provided during the Annual Meeting to anyone who wants to vote in person at the meeting. If you hold shares in street name, you must request a confirmation of beneficial ownership from your broker to vote in person at the meeting.

Q: Can I change my vote?

A: Yes. If you are a shareholder of record, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time prior to the voting thereof at the Annual Meeting by:

Submitting a valid, later-dated proxy/voting instruction card;

Submitting a valid, subsequent vote by telephone or the Internet at any time prior to 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on May 4, 2016;8, 2019;

Notifying our Secretary in writing that you have revoked your proxy; or

Completing a written ballot at the Annual Meeting.Meeting (your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, in and of itself, revoke your prior proxy).

If your shares are held in a brokerage account in your broker’s name, you should follow the instructions for changing or revoking your vote provided by your broker or nominee.

Q: What will happen if I do not instruct my broker how to vote?

A: If your shares are held in street name and you do not instruct your broker how to vote, one of two things can happen depending on the type of proposal. Pursuant to New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, brokers have discretionary power to vote your shares on “routine” matters, but they do not have discretionary power to vote your shares on “non-routine” matters. We believe that the only proposal that will be considered routine under NYSE rules is the Deloitte Ratification Proposal, which means that your broker may vote your shares in its discretion on that proposal. This is known as “broker discretionary voting.”

The election of directors, the Say-on-PayArticles Amendment Proposal and the Incentive PlanSay-on-Pay Proposal are considered non-routine matters. Accordingly, your broker may not vote your shares with respect to these matters if you have not provided instructions. This is called a “broker non-vote.”

We strongly encourage you to submit your proxy and exercise your right to vote as a shareholder.


Q: How many shares must be present to conduct business at the Annual Meeting?

A: Holders of at least a majority of the votes that all shareholders are entitled to cast at the Annual Meeting must be represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting in order to conduct business. This is called a quorum. If you vote, your shares will be part of the quorum. Abstentions, “Withheld” votes and broker non-votes also will be counted in determining whether a quorum exists.

Q: What vote is required to approve the proposals?

A: In the election of directors, the nominees who receive the most votes for the available positions will be elected. If you withhold authority to vote for a particular nominee, your vote will not count either “FOR” or “AGAINST” the nominee. Abstentions are not counted in the election of directors, and neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will affect the outcome.

Since all members of the Board of Directors have voted “FOR” the Articles Amendment Proposal, the approval by the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares, voting together as a single class, is required to adopt the Articles Amendment Proposal.  Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the Articles Amendment Proposal.

The Say-on-Pay Proposal, the Incentive Plan Proposal and the Deloitte Ratification Proposal will require approval by the majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting, assuming the presence of a quorum. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will have any effect on these proposals other than the Incentive Plan Proposal. With respect to the Incentive Plan Proposal, abstentions will count as votes cast and will have the effect of a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes will not count as votes cast with respect to the Incentive Plan Proposal and will have no effect on the outcome of that proposal. proposals.

Votes will be tabulated by the independentan inspector of election appointed for the Annual Meeting, who will separately tabulate affirmative and negative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes.

Q: What does it mean if I receive more than one notice or proxy card or voting instruction form?

A: It means your shares are registered differently or are held in more than one account at the transfer agent and/or with banks or brokers. Please vote all of your shares.

Q: What do I need to do to attend the Annual Meeting?

A: Valid government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, is required to attend the Annual Meeting. The registration desk will open at 9:45 a.m. and the meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m.AM. Please note that seating in the meeting room is limited.

If you own shares in street name, you will need to ask your bank or broker for an admission card in the form of a confirmation of beneficial ownership. You will need to bring a confirmation of beneficial ownership with you to vote at the Annual Meeting. If you do not receive your confirmation of beneficial ownership in time, bring your most recent brokerage statement with you to the Annual Meeting. We can use that to verify your ownership of Common Stock and admit you to the meeting; however, you will not be able to vote your shares at the meeting.

Q: Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

A: We plan to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and to publish final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting.

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be used at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION (the “Corporation”) to be held on May 5, 2016.9, 2019. The first mailing of the proxy material to the shareholders is expected to be made on or about March 15, 2016.

29, 2019.

The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Corporation. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by use of the mails, proxies may be solicited by directors and employees, in person or by telephone, and brokers and nominees may be requested to send proxy material to and obtain proxies from their principals. The Corporation will pay the costs incurred for solicitations of proxies.


Any shareholder has the power to revoke the proxy at any time prior to the voting thereof. Revocation of the proxy will not be effective until notice thereof has been given to the Secretary of the Corporation, a duly executed proxy bearing a later date is presented or the shareholder subsequently votes the shares subject to the proxy.

VOTING SECURITIES AND RECORD DATE

Only holders of record of Common Stock of the Corporation at the close of business on March 11, 201612, 2019, will be entitled to vote at the meeting. On that date, there were 12,216,57812,494,846 shares of Common Stock outstanding. The holders of those shares are entitled to one vote per share. In the election of directors, the shares may be voted cumulatively. Cumulative voting means that the number of shares owned by each shareholder may be multiplied by the number of directors to be elected and that total voted for the nominees in any proportion. Shares that are not voted cumulatively are voted on a one vote per share basis for each nominee, except for those nominees, if any, for whom the shareholder is withholding authority to vote. If you return your signed proxy but do not indicate how you wish to vote, your shares will be voted non-cumulatively “FOR” the election of each of the director nominees named in this Proxy Statement or voted cumulatively for one or more of the nominees at the discretion of the Proxies; “FOR” approval of the Say-on-PayArticles Amendment Proposal; “FOR” approval of the Incentive PlanSay-on-Pay Proposal; and “FOR” approval of the Deloitte Ratification Proposal.

REQUIRED VOTE

Under Pennsylvania law and the Corporation’s Amended and Restated By-laws,Bylaws, the presence of a quorum is required to transact business at the 20162019 Annual Meeting. A quorum is defined as the presence, either in person or by proxy, of a majority of the votes that all shareholders are entitled to cast at the meeting. For these purposes, shares that are present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting will be counted toward a quorum, regardless of whether the holder of the shares or proxy abstains with respect to or withholds authority to vote on a particular matter, whether a broker is present or represented by proxy but lacks discretionary voting authority with respect to any particular matter or whether a broker with discretionary authority fails to exercise such authority with respect to any particular matter.

Proposal 1—Election of Directors. With respect to the election of directors, the nominees who receive the most votes for the available positions will be elected. If you withhold authority to vote for a particular nominee on your proxy card, your vote will not count either “FOR” or “AGAINST” the nominee. Abstentions are not counted in the election of directors, and neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will affect the outcome.

Proposal 2—Articles Amendment Proposal.  The Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation (the “Articles”) require the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than 75% of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote in an annual election of directors, voting together as a single class, to amend the Articles, unless such amendment has been approved by at least a two-third vote of the whole Board of Directors, in which event the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than a majority of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote in an annual election of directors, voting together as a single class, is required. Since all members of the Board of Directors have voted “FOR” the Articles Amendment Proposal, the approval by the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares, voting together as a single class, is required to adopt the Articles Amendment Proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the Articles Amendment Proposal.

Proposal 2—Say-on-Pay Proposal3 — Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. The approval of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required for advisory (non-binding) approval of our executive compensation program under the Say-on-Pay Proposal. The vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Corporation, the Compensation Committee or our Board. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will count as votes cast and neither will affect the outcome of the Say-on-Pay Proposal.

Proposal 3—Incentive Plan Proposal. The approval of the Incentive Plan Proposal will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. Broker non-votes will not count as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome. Abstentions will count as votes cast and will have the effect of a vote against the Incentive Plan Proposal.

Proposal 4—Deloitte Ratification Proposal. With respect to the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2016,2019, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required for approval. If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte, the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee, but Deloitte may still be retained. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will count as votes cast and neither will affect the outcome of the Deloitte Ratification Proposal.


If a broker indicates on its proxy that it does not have authority to vote certain shares held in “street name,” the shares not voted are referred to as “broker non-votes.” Broker non-votes occur when brokers do not have discretionary voting authority to vote certain shares held in street name on particular proposals under the rules of the NYSE, and the beneficial owner of those shares has not instructed the broker how to vote on those proposals. If you are a beneficial owner, your broker, bank or other nominee is permitted to exercise discretionary authority to vote your shares on Proposal 4,3, the Deloitte Ratification Proposal, even if it does not receive voting instructions from you. However, it is not permitted to exercise discretionary authority to vote your shares on Proposals 1-31 and 2 in the absence of voting instructions from you.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Proposal 1)

A class of fourtwo directors will stand for election for a term of three years to fill the class of directors whose term expires in 2016. All2019. One of the two nominees for election to the Board of Directors areis currently directors. Mr. Johan Fredrik Strömholm was initially appointed to the Board of Directors in the class of directors whose term expires at this Annual Meeting of shareholders pursuant to a Shareholder Support Agreement entered into by the Corporation on March 3, 2016 with Altor Fund II GP Limited in connection with our acquisition of Åkers AB and certain of its affiliates.director. The nominees were recommended by the Nominating and Governance Committee and nominated by the Board of Directors at its March meeting and have indicated that they are willing to serve as directors if elected.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW.If at the time of the Annual Meeting a nominee should be unable or unwilling to stand for election, the proxies will be voted for the election of such person, if any, as may be selected by the Board of Directors to replace him.him or her.  

NomineesNominee for DirectorsDirector for a Term of Office Expiring in 2019:2022:

LEONARD M. CARROLLELIZABETH A. FESSENDEN (age 73,63, Director since 1996)2017). Mr. CarrollMs. Fessenden served in several leadership positions at Alcoa Inc. from 1977 to 2005. Since 2008, she has been Managing Directorthe principal of Seneca Capital Management, Inc.,Fessenden Associates, a private investment company, for more than five years. The Board concluded that Mr. Carroll should servebusiness consulting company. She has been a member of the board of directors of Quarles Petroleum since January of 2015. She also served as a director because of his broad financial backgroundCardno from 2014 to 2015 and investment knowledge. He isof O’Brien & Gere, from 2008 to 2014. Ms. Fessenden also served on the advisory board of Alloy Polymers and the board of directors of Polymer Group Inc. Ms. Fessenden was appointed to the Board effective as of August 10, 2017, to fill a retired Certified Public Accountant and has held various positionsnewly created directorship. Ms. Fessenden’s extensive operations experience in the bankingmetals industry, including President, Director and Chairman for over 37 years.

LAURENCE E. PAUL (age 51, Director since 1998). Mr. Paul has been a managing principalher many years of Laurel Crown Partners, a private investment company, for more than five years and prior to that was an investment banker for ten years. He became a President of The Louis Berkman Investment Company, a private investment company, in 2013. Mr. Paul’s experienceservice as a senior investment bankerdirector of companies, and private equity investor for almost twenty yearsher broad leadership experience led the Board to conclude that he possessed skills in financial management and risk assessment that would be beneficial to the Corporation.

ERNEST G. SIDDONS (age 82, Director since 1981). Mr. Siddons was President and Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation for more than five years prior to his retirement in April 2009. With more than thirty years of

experience with the Corporation in operations and financial management, the Board concluded that Mr. Siddonsshe should serve as a director. Positions held earlier with the Corporation, including those of Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and President of Union Electric Steel Corporation, and his qualification as a Chartered Accountant were also considered.

J. FREDRIK STRÖMHOLMTERRY L. DUNLAP (age 50, Director since 2016)59, Nominated in 2019).  Mr. StrömholmDunlap served in several leadership positions at Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, a global manufacturer of technically advanced specialty materials and complex components, from 1983 to 2014, where he last served as Executive Vice President, ATI Flat-Rolled Products, from 2011 to 2014. Mr. Dunlap has been the principal of Sweetwater LLC, a consulting and investment firm with a primary focus on metals and manufacturing, since January 2015. Mr. Dunlap has been a partnermember of Altor Equity Partners AB, Stockholm for more than five yearsthe board of directors of Matthews International since February 2015 and served as its managing partner from 2010 through 2014. Since, 2008, Mr. Strömholm hasthe board of directors of TimkenSteel since August 2015. He also served on the board of Akersdirectors of Elliott Group Holdings AB,from 2015 to 2019. Mr. Dunlap’s extensive operations experience in the parent company of Akers AB, a global manufacturer of rolls to the steelmetals industry, which was recently acquired by the Corporation, since 2008. Mr. Strömholm was also a director of Ferrosan Holding A/S, Ferrosan Medical Devices A/S, and Carnegie Holding AB, among others, all of which were companies owned by Altor Equity Partners AB. Prior to 2003, Strömholm was a managing director at Goldman Sachs International in London. Mr. Strömholm’s long-term financial and investment background and his many years of services as a director of companiesboard service and broad leadership experience led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

Continuing Directors Whose Term of Office Expires in 2018:

2021:

MICHAEL I. GERMAN (age 65,68, Director since 2014). Mr. German has been the Chief Executive Officer and President of Corning Natural Gas Holding Corporation (formerly known as Corning Natural Gas Corporation), a holding company for natural gas utility,and electric utilities, for more than five years. Mr. German also serves as President of Corning Appliance Company and Leatherstocking Gas Company. Mr. German has been a director of Corning Natural Gas Holding Corporation since 2014 (and a director of Corning Natural Gas Corporation from 2006 until 2014) and is on the Boards of Directors of Three River Development Corporation and Northeast Gas Association, as well as the Boardboard of Trusteestrustees of the Adirondack Park Institute. Mr. German also was a director of Pennichuck Corporation from 2008 until 2011. Mr. German’s experience as the chief executive officer of a public company, his many years of service as a director of companies and his broad leadership experience led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

PAUL A. GOULDJ. BRETT MCBRAYER (age 70,53, Director since 2002)2018).  Mr. Gould has been with Allen & Co., Inc., an investment banking company and has been managing director of that company for more than five years. He is currently a director of Liberty Global, Inc. and Discovery Communications, Inc. During the last five years, he has served as a director of Liberty Media Corporation and Discovery Holding Company but he resigned from those boards in 2009. Mr. Gould’s long-term financial and investment background led to the Board’s conclusion that he should serve as a director.

JOHN S. STANIK (age 62, Director since 2015). Mr. StanikMcBrayer has served as the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer since January 2015.July of 2018.  He previously worked at Calgon Carbon Corporation, an international company specializing in purification products, technologies and services, from 1991 through 2012 when he retired for personal reasons. Mr. Stanik served as President and Chief Executive Officer at Airtex Products and ASC Industries, a global manufacturer and distributor of Calgon Carbonautomotive aftermarket and OEM fuel and


water pumps, from 2003 to 2012 and became its Chairman of the Board in 2007. Prior to joining Calgon Carbon,through 2017. Mr. Stanik worked in various capacities with increasing responsibility for Davy Corporation, an engineeringMcBrayer had also served as Vice President and construction company specializing in the metals (steel and aluminum) markets, ultimately serving as Davy’s General Manager of Operations. He is currently a directorthe Alcan Cable business at Rio Tinto Alcan, as Vice President and General Manager of FNBthe Specialty Metals Division at Precision Cast Parts Corporation, a financial services corporation, which operates banks under the name First National Bankand held positions of various responsibility and leadership during his 20 years with Alcoa, Inc.  Mr. McBrayer’s extensive experience in Ohio, Maryland and Pennsylvania. Mr. Stanik’s experience as the chief executive officer and director of a public company, his many years of service as a director of companiesglobal industrial businesses and his broad executive leadership experience led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

Continuing Directors Whose Term of Office Expires in 2017:2020:

JAMES J. ABEL (age 70,73, Director since 2014). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Abel served as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of CPI Corporation, an operator of portrait studios, from February 2012 to April 2013 and as a director from 2004 to April 2013. CPI Corporation filed a petition under federal bankruptcy laws in May 2013. Mr. Abel previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Financial Executives International,

a firm representing senior financial executives in dealing with regulatory agencies involved with corporate financial reporting and internal controls, from May 2008 to February 2009. Mr. Abel has served as a director of The LGL Group, Inc., a globally-positioned producer of industrial and commercial electronic components and instruments, from 2011 until 2014. In 2015, Mr. Abel was appointed as a director of PMV Acquisition Corp. Mr. Abel’s background as a senior executive, his expertise in financial management and his experience with manufacturing operations, as well as his board experience, led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

WILLIAM K. LIEBERMAN (age 68,71, Director since 2004). Mr. Lieberman has been President of The Lieberman Companies, insurance brokerage and consulting company, for more than five years. In addition to more than forty years of management experience in the insurance, benefit and risk management areas, Mr. Lieberman has served as a director or trustee of many organizations including charitable companies, hospitals and universities. These qualifications led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

STEPHEN E. PAUL (age 48,51, Director since 2002). Mr. Paul has been a managing principal of Laurel Crown Partners, a private investment company, for more than five years. He became a President of The Louis Berkman Investment Company, a private investment company, in 2013. Mr. Paul’s background in investment banking and private equity investment led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

CARL H. PFORZHEIMER, III (age 79,82, Director since 1982). Mr. Pforzheimer has been Managing Partner or Manager of Carl H. Pforzheimer & Co. LLC, an investment banking firm, or its predecessors or related entities for more than five years. In addition to the attendant investment advisory analytical skills gained from such a position, his former role as chairman of the Audit and Risk Management Committees of U. S. Trust Co. led the Board to conclude Mr. Pforzheimer should serve as a director.



Laurence E. Paul and Stephen E. Paul are brothers and the sons of Robert A. Paul. There are no other family relationships among the directors and officers.

Chairman Emeritus

ROBERT A. PAUL (age 77). On March 2, 2016, Mr. Robert A. Paul, our Chief Executive Officer until his retirement on December 31, 2014, announced his resignation as a member of the Board of Directors, including his position as the Chairman of the Board, effective immediately. Also on March 2, 2016 the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Paul as Chairman Emeritus and as a Director Emeritus, in accordance with and pursuant to Article II, Section 20 of the Corporation’s Amended and Restated By-Laws. As Chairman Emeritus and as a Director Emeritus, Mr. Paul will assist the Board in a non-voting advisory role and will be compensated for his services and reimbursed expenses incurred as determined by the Board of Directors. Mr. Paul is also the Chairman and a director of The Louis Berkman Investment Company, a private investment company.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEGOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Summary

Presented below are some highlights of our corporate governance practices and policies. You can find further details about these and other corporate governance practices and policies in the following pages of this Proxy Statement.

Our Board of Directors is currently comprised of 1110 directors, a majority of whom have been determined by the Board to be independent. Because three of our directors are not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting, our Board adopted a resolution on March 6, 2019, to reduce the size of the Board to nine, as permitted by our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation. Thus, immediately following the Annual Meeting, if Ms. Fessenden and Mr. Dunlap are elected to the Board by our shareholders, there will be eight directors on our Board, with one vacancy remaining.  Pursuant to the Shareholder Support Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2016, by and among the Corporation, Altor Fund II GP Limited (“Altor Fund”), and other signatories thereto, Altor Fund is entitled to designate one nominee to serve on our Board, until such time when Altor Fund and certain of its affiliates own, in the aggregate, less than 888,302 shares.  Altor Fund’s prior nominee, Mr. Fredrik Strömholm, resigned from the Board effective May 9, 2018, and Altor Fund has not designated another nominee since his resignation.

We currently have separate non-executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles. Leonard M. Carroll servesOn March 6, 2019, the Board elected James J. Abel to serve as our non-executive Chairman.Chairman, effective as of May 9, 2019.

All of the Board’s standing committees, other than the Executive Committee, are composed entirely of independent directors, and each such standing committee has a written charter that is reviewed and reassessed annually. The charters of each of those standing committees are posted on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com.

We have an annual self-evaluation process for the Board and each standing committee.committee, other than the Executive Committee.

The Board evaluates individual directors whose terms are nearing expiration and who may be proposed for re-election. The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders on the same basis as other candidates.

The Board has designated Carl H. Pforzheimer, III, Chairman of our Audit Committee, as an “audit committee financial expert.” Our internal audit function reports directly to the Audit Committee. We annually ask our shareholders to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of the Corporation’s independent auditors.

The Corporation has determined that it will hold a Say-on-Pay vote annually until the next shareholder vote on the frequency of such votes, which we expect to be in 2017.votes.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of the Corporation’s officers, directors and employees, and our additional Code of Ethics, which applies to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, are available on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com.

The Board has adopted an anti-hedging policy pursuant to which, without prior approval, no director, officer or employee of the Corporation at any time may purchase financial instruments that are designed to or that may reasonably be expected to have the effect of hedging or offsetting a decrease in the market value of any securities of the Corporation.

The Board has adopted an anti-pledging policy pursuant to which officers and directors of the Corporation are prohibited from holding any securities of the Corporation in margin accounts or pledging any securities of the Corporation as collateral for any loan, subject to exceptions for de minimis pledging with prior approval.

The Board has adopted a Clawback Policy in connection with short and long term incentive plans. Pursuant to the Policy, if the Corporation is required, because of fraud or negligence, to restate financial results for any Restatement Period in a manner that would have adversely affected the amount of the payout of any incentive compensation awards, the Compensation Committee has the right during the three-year period following the Restatement Period to review the matter and determine what, if any, repayment participants will be required to submit.


 

The Board has adopted a clawback policy in connection with short and long-term incentive plans. Pursuant to the policy, if the Corporation is required, because of fraud or negligence, to restate financial results for any restatement period in a manner that would have adversely affected the amount of the payout of any incentive compensation awards, the Compensation Committee has the right, during the three-year period following the restatement period, to review the matter and determine what, if any, repayment participants will be required to make.

The Board has adopted a policy prohibiting excise tax gross-ups of perquisites pursuant to which the Corporation is prohibited from making any tax gross-up payments to executive officers, except for gross-ups applicable to management employees generally, such as an expatriate tax equalization payment.

The Board has adopted a Whistleblower Policywhistleblower policy to protect any employee who, in good faith, reports incidents of unethical business conduct, violations of laws or accounting standards, internal accounting controls or audit standards or danger to employees or public health and safety.

Board Independence

The Board of Directors has adopted categorical standards to assist it in evaluating the independence of its directors. The standards are attached to the Corporate Governance Guidelines which are available on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com. After performing this evaluation in accordance with those guidelines, the Board has determined that James J. Abel, Leonard M. Carroll, Elizabeth A. Fessenden, Michael I. German, Paul A. Gould, William K. Lieberman, and Carl H. Pforzheimer, III, and Ernest G. Siddons do not have material relationships with the Corporation (other than as members of the Board of Directors) and are independent within the meaning of the Corporation’s independence standards and those of the NYSE.

Audit Committee members must meet additional independence standards under NYSE listing standards and rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Specifically, Audit Committee members may not receive any compensation from the Corporation other than their directors’ compensation. The Board has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee satisfies the enhanced standards of independence applicable to Audit Committee members under NYSE listing standards and SEC rules.

The Board has determined in its judgment that the Compensation Committee is composed entirely of independent directors within the Corporation’s independence standards and those of the NYSE. In making its determination, the Board considered, among other things, the factors applicable to members of the Compensation Committee pursuant to NYSE listing standards and Rule 10C-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Leadership Structure

John S. StanikMr. McBrayer is the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Leonard M. Carroll currently serves as the non-executive Chairman.  On March 6, 2019, the Board voted to elect Mr. James J. Abel as non-executive Chairman of the Board, effective as of May 9, 2019. The Chairman sets the agendas for and presides over the Board meetings. Mr. StanikMcBrayer is a member of the Board and participates in its meetings. The Board believes that this leadership structure is appropriate for the Corporation at this time because it allows for independent oversight of management, increases management accountability and encourages an objective evaluation of management’s performance relative to compensation. The Board will assess periodically whether the roles should be separated or combined based on its evaluation of what is in the best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders.

As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. StanikMcBrayer is the full-time executive managing the day-to-day operations of the Corporation.

Director Nominating Procedures

The Corporation’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and its Nominating and Governance Committee Charter charge the Nominating and Governance Committee with selecting nominees for election to the Board of Directors and with reviewing, at least annually, the qualifications of new and existing members of the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee also considers the extent to which such members may be considered “independent”


“independent” within the meaning of applicable NYSE rules, as well as other appropriate factors, including overall skills and experience.

From time to time, the Nominating and Governance Committee will seek to identify potential candidates for director nominees and will consider potential candidates proposed by other members of the Board of Directors, by management of the Corporation or by shareholders of the Corporation.

In considering candidates submitted by shareholders of the Corporation, the Nominating and Governance Committee will take into consideration the needs of the Board of Directors and the candidate’s qualifications. To have a candidate considered by the Committee, a shareholder must submit the recommendation in writing and must provide the information set forth in, and otherwise comply with, Section 18 of Article II of the Corporation’s Amended and Restated By-Laws.

The shareholder recommendation and information described above must be sent to Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation “c/o Corporate Secretary” at 726 Bell Avenue, Suite 301, P.O. Box 457, Carnegie, PA 15106 and, in order to allow for timely consideration, must be received not less than 90 days in advance of the anniversary date of the Corporation’s most recent annual meeting of shareholders.

Once a person has been identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee as a potential candidate, the Committee may collect and review publicly available information regarding the person to assess whether the person should be considered further. Generally, if the person expresses a willingness to be considered and to serve on the Board of Directors and the Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the candidate has the potential to be a good candidate, the Nominating and Governance Committee would seek to gather information from or about the candidate. Such information may include information gathered through one or more interviews as appropriate and review of his or her accomplishments and qualifications generally, in light of any other candidates that the Nominating and Governance Committee may be considering. The Nominating and Governance Committee’s evaluation process does not vary based on whether the candidate is recommended by a shareholder. Although the Nominating and Governance Committee does not have a formal written diversity policy, it does strive to identify candidates for director with diverse education and career backgrounds to better serve the Corporation and periodically evaluatesconsiders the diversity of our Board as a whole, including the backgroundsskills, background and experience of the Corporation’sour directors.

Non-Management Directors

The non-management directors have regularly scheduled executive sessions. Any shareholder who wants to communicate directly with the presiding director or the non-management directors as a group can do so by following the procedure below under “Shareholder Communications with Directors”.

Shareholder Communications with Directors

The Board of Directors has established a process to receive communications from shareholders and other interested parties. To communicate with the Board of Directors, any individual director or any group or committee of directors, correspondence should be addressed to the Board of Directors or such individual or group or committee and sent to Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation “c/o Corporate Secretary” at 726 Bell Avenue, Suite 301, P.O. Box 457, Carnegie, PA 15106. Communications sent in this manner will be reviewed by the office of the Corporate Secretary for the purpose of determining whether the contents represent a message to one or more of the Corporation’s directors. Depending on the subject matter, the Corporate Secretary may attempt to handle the inquiry directly, such as when it is a request for information about the Corporation or a stock-related matter. The Corporate Secretary also may not forward the communication if it is primarily commercial in nature or it relates to an improper or irrelevant topic.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors as a whole is responsible for risk management oversight of the Corporation and ensuring that management develops sound business strategies. The involvement of the full Board of Directors in setting the Corporation’s business strategy and objectives is integral to the Board’s assessment of our risk profile and also a determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk and how best to manage any such risk. This involves receiving reports and/or presentations from applicable members of management, the Chief Risk Officer, the Enterprise Risk Management Committee of the Corporation, and the committees of the Board. The full Board of Directors


continually evaluates risks such as financial risk, legal/compliance risk, operational/strategic risk, cybersecurity risk and fraud risk and addresses individual risk issues with management throughout the year as necessary.

While the Board of Directors has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, the Board delegates responsibility for certain aspects of risk management to its standing committees. In particular, the Audit Committee focuses on enterprise risks and related controls and procedures, including financial reporting, fraud and regulatory risks. The Compensation Committee strives to create compensation practices that do not encourage excessive levels of risk taking that would be inconsistent with the Corporation’s strategy and objectives. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the Corporation’s corporate governance and corporate governance principles. The Board’s role in risk oversight has not had any effect on the Board’s leadership structure.

Director Terms

The Board is divided into three classes, and the directors in each class serve for three-year terms unless unable to continue to serve due to death, resignation, retirement or disability. The term of one class of directors expires each year at the Corporation’s annual meeting of shareholders. The Board may fill a vacancy by electing a new director to the same class as the director being replaced or by reassigning a director from another class. The Board also may create a new director position in any class and elect a director to hold the newly created position. It is expected that newIn accordance with our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, all directors elected to the Board will standfill vacancies shall hold office for election by the shareholdersa term expiring at the annual meeting immediately subsequent to such election, regardlessof shareholders at which the term of the class intoto which such new director is elected.they have been elected expires.

Director Emeritus

The Board of Directors may, from time to time, appoint a former director as Director Emeritus. The designation, number and term of each Director Emeritus shall be within the sole discretion of the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors may remove, with or without cause, a Director Emeritus at any time. A Director Emeritus, shall provide consulting or advisory services to the Board of Directors as requested from time to time by the Board of Directors and may be invited to attend meetings of the Board of Directors at the request of the Chairman but shall not vote, serve on any committee of the Board of Directors or be counted in determining a quorum. Each Director Emeritus shall be compensated for his services and reimbursed expenses incurred as determined by the Board of Directors by resolution from time to time.

Annual Meeting Attendance

The Corporation encourages its directors to attend the Annual Meeting of the Corporation’s shareholders. All of the directors then in office were in attendance at the 20152018 Annual Meeting except Stephen E. Paul.

Meeting.



BOARD COMMITTEES AND RELATED MATTERSCOMMITTEES; DIRECTOR COMPENSATION; STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

Summary

During 2015,2018, the Board had four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Executive Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Board makes committee and committee chair assignments annually at its meeting immediately preceding the annual meeting of shareholders, although further changes to committee assignments may be made from time to time as deemed appropriate by the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee Charter, the Audit Committee Charter and the Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com.

The current composition of the Board and each committee of the Board is set forth below:

 

Director    

Audit

  Committee 

    

 Compensation 

Committee

    

Executive

 Committee 

    

 Nominating and 

Corporate

Governance

Committee

    Board of
 Directors 

 

Audit

Committee

 

 

Compensation

Committee

 

 

Executive

Committee

 

 

Nominating and

Corporate

Governance

Committee

 

 

Board of

Directors

 

James J. Abel

           X  X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

C

 

 

X

 

Leonard M. Carroll

  X     C     X

Leonard M. Carroll1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C

 

 

 

 

 

 

C

 

Terry L. Dunlap

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Michael I. German

  X           X

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Paul A. Gould

  X  X     C  X

William K. Lieberman

  X  C  X  X  X

 

X

 

 

C

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Laurence E. Paul

              X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

J. Fredrik Strömholm

              X

Stephen E. Paul

              X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III

  C  X  X  X  X

 

C

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

Ernest G. Siddons

        X     X

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

John S. Stanik

        X     X
               

2015 Meetings

  5  4  1  2  8

2018 Meetings

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

7

 

 

X—Member

C—Chair

 

1.  Messrs. Carroll, L. Paul and Siddons have notified the Corporation that they do not intend to stand for re-election and, therefore, their service as directors of the Corporation will end at the Annual Meeting.

All of the directors attended at least 75% of the applicable Board and committee meetings in 2015,2018 except for Mr. StrömholmDunlap, who joinedwas elected to the board inBoard on March 2016.

6, 2019.

The independent, non-management directors meet separately in regularly scheduled executive sessions without members of management present, except to the extent that the non-management directors request the attendance of one or more members of management. The Chairman presides over meetings of the independentnon-management directors.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee held five5 meetings in 20152018 and was comprised of fivefour directors: Carl H. Pforzheimer, III (Chairman), Leonard M. Carroll, Paul A. Gould,Michael I. German, William K. Lieberman, and Michael I. German.Ernest G. Siddons.  Ms. Ann E. Whitty, a former director of the Corporation who resigned in August of 2018, also served on the Audit Committee prior to her resignation. None of the Audit Committee members is now, or has within the past five years been, an employee of the Corporation. The Board has determined that none of the members of the Audit Committee have any financial or personal ties to the Corporation (other than director compensation and equity ownership as described in this Proxy Statement) and that they meet the NYSE and SEC standards for independence applicable to members of the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee reviews the Corporation’s accounting and reporting practices, including internal control procedures, and maintains a direct line of communication with the Directors and the independent

accountants. The Audit Committee also is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of our


independent registered public accounting firm, including pre-approval of all audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, as well as evaluating the performance of our internal audit function and our financial reporting processes.

The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Pforzheimer meets the SEC criteria to be deemed an “audit committee financial expert” and meets the NYSE standard of having accounting or related financial management expertise. Each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee met fourfive times in 20152018 and is comprised of three directors: Paul A. Gould, William K. Lieberman (Chairman), Paul A. Gould (until May 2018), Elizabeth A. Fessenden (effective May 2018) and Carl H. Pforzheimer, III. The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board of Directors compensation programs and policies and reviewing and recommending to the Board of Directors the participation of executives and other key management employees in the various compensation plans of the Corporation.

The Compensation Committee, under the terms of its charter, has the sole authority to retain, approve fees and other terms for, and terminate any compensation consultant used to assist the Compensation Committee in executive compensation matters. The Compensation Committee also may obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal, accounting or other advisors. In 2015,2018, the Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance LLC as its independent provider of compensation consulting services for decisions relating to 20152018 compensation. The Committee also utilizes external legal advisors and assesses the independence of its advisors.

Certain executive officers of the Corporation attend meetings of the Compensation Committee from time to time and are given the opportunity to express their views on executive compensation matters.

Each member of the Compensation Committee is a “non-employee director” of the Corporation as defined under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and each member is also an “outside director” for the purposes of the corporate compensation provisions contained in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee met oncedid not meet in 2015.2018. It wasis comprised of the following sixfive directors: Robert A. Paul (former Chairman), Leonard M. Carroll (current Chairman)(Chairman), James J. Abel, J. Brett McBrayer (effective July 2018), William K. Lieberman, Carl H. Pforzheimer, III, Ernest G. Siddons, and John S. Stanik.Stanik (until July 2018). This Committee is responsible for providing guidance and counsel to the Corporation’s management team on significant matters affecting the Corporation and taking action on behalf of the Board where required in exigent circumstances, such as where it is impracticable or infeasible to convene, or obtain the unanimous written consent of, the full Board.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee met twicethree times in 20152018 and was comprised of four directors: James J. Abel, Paul A. Gould (Chairman) (until May 2018), James J. Abel (Chairman effective May 2018), William K. Lieberman and Carl H. Pforzheimer, III. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to become directors and recommending candidates for membership on the Board of Directors and its committees, developing and recommending to the Board of Directors the Corporation’s corporate governance policies and reviewing the effectiveness of board governance, including overseeing an annual assessment of the performance of the Board of Directors and each of its committees.


Director Compensation

In 2015,2018, each director who was not employed by the Corporation received an annual retainer of $50,000,$40,000, payable quarterly in cash in equal installments. The Chairman of the Board received an additional $25,000 fee, the Chairman of the Audit Committee received an additional $6,500$15,000 annual fee, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee received an additional $10,000 fee, and the non-employee chairsChairman of other Committeesthe Nominating and Governance Committee received an additional $2,000 annually.$7,500 fee. Further, members of Board committees received the following additional fees: $7,500 for the Audit committee, $5,000 for the Compensation committee, and $3,750 for the Nominating and Governance


Committee. Each non-employee director also received an annual stock award valued at $25,000 and the following meeting fees in cash: $2,500 for each Board meeting attended, whether in person or by telephone; $2,000 for attendance in person at each Audit Committee meeting and $1,000 if participation was by telephone; and $1,500 for attendance in person at all other committee meetings and $500 if participation was by telephone. In 2015, directors did$70,000. Directors do not receive a fee for Board or committee meetings if they did not attend.

meeting fees. The Compensation Committee reviews director compensation annually, in consultation with Pay Governance LLC, and considers whether changes are necessary.

The table below summarizes the director compensation earned by non-employee directors of the Corporation in 2015:2018:

 

Name(1)    

 Fees Earned or 
Paid in

Cash($)(2)

      Stock Awards 
($)(3)
      Total ($)  

 

Fees Earned or

Paid in

Cash($)(2)

 

 

Stock Awards

($)(3)

 

 

Other

Compensation

($)

 

 

Total ($)

 

James J. Abel

      65,000        25,000        90,000  

 

 

45,938

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

115,938

 

Leonard M. Carroll

      75,500        25,000        100,500  

(5)

 

65,000

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

135,000

 

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

 

43,333

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

113,333

 

Michael I. German

      68,000        25,000        93,000  

 

 

47,500

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

117,500

 

Paul A. Gould

      73,500        25,000        98,500  

(4)

 

15,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

15,000

 

William K. Lieberman

      85,499        25,000        110,499  

 

 

61,250

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

131,250

 

Laurence E. Paul

      66,500        25,000        91,500  

(5)

 

40,000

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

110,000

 

Stephen E. Paul

      64,000        25,000        89,000  

 

 

40,000

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

110,000

 

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III

      83,500        25,000        108,500  

 

 

63,750

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

133,750

 

Ernest G. Siddons

      69,500        25,000        94,500  

(5)

 

47,500

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

117,500

 

Robert A. Paul(4)

      200,000        0        200,000  

Fredrik Strömholm

(4)

 

10,000

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

80,000

 

Ann E. Whitty

(4)

 

26,413

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

96,413

 

 

(1)

John S. Stanik has served as the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and as a director sincefrom January 1, 2015.2015 until June 30, 2018. Mr. Stanik did not receive any compensation for his service on the Board of Directors in 2015.2018. J. Brett McBrayer joined the Corporation as Chief Executive Officer on July 1, 2018. He has served as a director since that time. Mr. McBrayer did not receive any compensation for his service on the Board of Directors in 2018.

(2)

This column reflects annual cash retainer fees, including committee chair fees, as well as Board and committee meetingmembership fees paid to each listed director.

(3)

This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of the stock awards granted to directors. The assumptions made in calculating the grant date fair values are set forth in Note 915 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018.

(4)

In connection with

Paul A. Gould did not run for re-election at the end of his service asthree-year term which expired at the non-executive Chairman2018 annual meeting of the Board, Mr. Paul received total annual cash compensation in the amount of $200,000 in 2015. This total annual cash compensation was provided in lieu of the compensation arrangements applicable to non-employee directors and took into consideration the additional time and commitment attendant to the duties of the position of Chairman. Mr. Paul retired andshareholders. Frederik Strömholm resigned from the Board of Directors in March 2016.effective May 9, 2018, due to personal reasons. Ann E. Whitty resigned from the Board of Directors effective August 7, 2018, due to personal reasons.

(5)

Leonard M. Carroll, Laurence E. Paul and Ernest G. Siddons have each notified the Corporation that they do not intend to stand for re-election and, therefore, their service as directors of the Corporation will end at the annual meeting.

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We have a long-standing approach of compensating directors in part with stock awards and encouraging retention of stock acquired through such awards or by market purchases. We believe retention of stock creates a long-term perspective and aligns the interests of our directors with those of our shareholders. In furtherance of this approach, the Board of Directors has established stock ownership guidelines for our CEO requiring the CEO

to hold a minimum of 20,00030,000 shares of the Corporation’s common stock, subject to certain exceptions for reasonable estate and tax planning and diversification purposes. In February, 2015, the Board increased the minimum to 30,000 shares and gave Mr. Stanik aMcBrayer has five year periodyears to acquire the shares.


The Board of Directors is covered by a director stock ownership policy which provides that all directors must hold at least 1,000 shares of the Corporation’s common stock. All current directors except for J. Fredrik Strömholm, satisfy this policy as of March 11, 2016.12, 2019. The Board of Directors will review these guidelines at least annually to evaluate whether they remain effective.

SECURITY OWNERSHIPOWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN


BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Beneficial Ownership of More Than Five Percent

The following table sets forth information, to the extent known by the Corporation, concerning individuals (other than directors or officers of the Corporation) or entities holding more than five percent of the outstanding shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock. The “percent of class” in the table below is calculated based upon 12,216,57812,494,846 shares outstanding as of March 11, 2016.12, 2019.

 

Name of

beneficial owner

    Amount and nature  of
beneficial ownership
     Percent
of class
 

Gabelli Funds, Inc.

(and affiliates)

Corporate Center

Rye, NY 10580

     2,431,808(1)      19.9

Altor Fund II GP Limited

11-15 Seaton Place

St Helier

Jersey JE4 OQH

Channel Islands

     1,776,604(2)      14.54

The Louis Berkman Investment Company

P. O. Box 576

Steubenville, OH 43952

     1,437,241(3)      11.76

Name of beneficial owner

 

Amount and nature of

beneficial ownership

 

 

 

Percent

of class

 

Mario J. Gabelli

(and entities which he controls or for which he acts as chief investment officer)

One Corporate Center

Rye, NY 10580

 

 

2,472,824

 

(1)

 

 

19.79

%

Altor Fund II GP Limited

(and affiliates)

11-15 Seaton Place

St Helier

Jersey JE4 OQH

Channel Islands

 

 

1,776,604

 

(2)

 

 

14.22

%

The Louis Berkman Investment Company

600 Grant Street, Suite 3230

Pittsburgh, PA 15219

 

 

1,275,706

 

(3)

 

 

10.21

%

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(4)

Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road

Austin, TX, 78746

 

 

760,578

 

(4)

 

 

6.09

%

 

(1)

Based on an

According to the amended Schedule 13D filed on September 26, 2018, Mario J. Gabelli beneficially owns 2,472,824 shares of our Common Stock and has sole dispositive and voting power with the SECrespect to such shares.

(2)

According to Schedule 13D filed on JuneApril 1, 2015 disclosing that the reporting persons had sole2016, Altor Fund beneficially owns 1,776,604 shares of our Common Stock. Altor Fund has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by each of the reporting persons, as set forth in the Schedule.

(3)

According to the amended Schedule 13D filed on April 10, 2018, and updated for subsequent sales reflected in FormsForm 4 filed on October 8, 2015, October 26, 2015, February 4, 2016, February 8, 2016July 31, 2018, The Louis Berkman Investment Company beneficially owns 1,275,706 shares of our Common Stock and February 23, 2016.

(2)Altor Fund II GP Limited has sole voting and dispositive power over thewith respect to such shares.  Mr. J. Fredrik Strömholm, a director of the Corporation, may also be deemed to beneficially own these shares by virtue of being a partner of Altor Equity Partners AB (which is the investment advisor to Altor Fund II GP Limited) and being an owner of and indirect investor in Altor Fund II GP Limited.

(3)Laurence E. Paul and Stephen E. Paul, directors of the Corporation, own 23.33%27.62% and 23.94%28.24%, respectively, of The Louis Berkman Investment Company’s non-voting stock, held in various trusts.

(4)

According to the amended Schedule 13G filed on February 8, 2019, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (“Dimensional Fund”) has sole dispositive power with respect to 760,578 shares our Common Stock and sole voting power with respect to 714,763 shares of our Common Stock. Dimensional Fund is an investment adviser to four investment companies and furnishes investment advice to certain funds, trusts and separate accounts (the “Funds”). All shares of Common Stock are owned by the Funds and Dimensional Fund disclaims beneficial ownership of these securities.


Director and Executive Officer Stock Ownership

The following table sets forth as of March 11, 201612, 2019, information concerning the beneficial ownership of the Corporation’s Common Stock by the Directors and Named Executive Officers and all Directors and Executive Officers of the Corporation as a group. The “percent of class” in the table below is calculated based upon 12,216,57812,494,846 shares outstanding as of March 11, 2016.12, 2019.

 

Name of

beneficial owner

    Amount and nature  of
beneficial ownership
     Percent
of class
 

 

Amount and nature of

beneficial ownership

 

 

 

Percent

of class

 

Laurence E. Paul

     1,444,946(1)      11.83

 

 

1,298,837

 

(1)

 

 

10.4

%

Stephen E. Paul

     1,444,946(2)      11.83

 

 

1,298,837

 

(2)

 

 

10.4

%

Terrence W. Kenny

     101,741(3)      *  

Robert G. Carothers

     100,109(4)      *  

Rose Hoover

     97,514(5)      *  

 

 

79,512

 

(3)

 

*

 

Marliss D. Johnson

     76,803(6)      *  

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III

 

 

41,733

 

(4)

 

*

 

James J. Abel

 

 

41,266

 

(5)

 

*

 

Ernest G. Siddons

     42,712(7)      *  

 

 

26,138

 

(6)

 

*

 

Leonard M. Carroll

 

 

25,631

 

(5)

 

*

 

Michael I. German

 

 

25,266

 

(5)

 

*

 

William K. Lieberman

     9,705(8)      *  

 

 

25,131

 

(7)

 

*

 

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III

     9,438(9)      *  

Leonard M. Carroll

     8,205(10)      *  

Paul A. Gould

     7,705(10)      *  

Michael I. German

     6,840(10)      *  

James J. Abel

     3,840(10)      *  

John S. Stanik

     5,649(10)      *  

 

 

21,036

 

(10)

 

*

 

J. Fredrik Strömholm

     1,776,604(11)      14.54

Robert A. Paul

     1,495,163(12)      12.24

Directors and Executive Officers as a group (17 persons)

     3,757,438(13)      30.76

Michael G. McAuley

 

 

8,541

 

(8)

 

*

 

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

 

7,217

 

(6)

 

*

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

 

4,000

 

(5)

 

*

 

Directors and Executive Officers as a group (18 persons)

 

 

1,740,695

 

(9)

 

 

13.9

%

 

*

Less than 1%

(1)

Represents 7,70523,131 shares owned directly and 1,437,2411,275,706 shares owned by The Louis Berkman Investment Company. Mr. Paul is a President of The Louis Berkman Investment Company and is a trustee of various trusts which own 23.33%27.62% of its non-voting stock.

(2)

Represents 7,70523,131 shares owned directly and 1,437,2411,275,706 shares owned by The Louis Berkman Investment Company. Mr. Paul is a President of The Louis Berkman Investment Company and is a trustee of various trusts which own 23.94%28.24% of its non-voting stock.

(3)

Represents 2,0006,958 shares owned directly, 98,867 shares that he has the right to acquire within sixty days pursuant to stock options and 874 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) that will vest within sixty days.

(4)Represents 98,833 shares that he has the right to acquire within sixty days pursuant to stock options and 1,276 RSUs that will vest within sixty days.

(5)Represents 1,000 shares owned directly, 95,50166,000 shares that she has the right to acquire within sixty days pursuant to stock options and 1,0136,554 RSUs that will vest within sixty days.

(6)

(4)

Represents 76,167 shares that she has the right to acquire within sixty days pursuant to stock options and 636 RSUs that will vest within sixty days.

(7)Includes 1,007 shares held jointly with his wife, 6,705 shares owned directly and 35,000 shares he has the right to acquire within sixty days pursuant to stock options.

(8)Includes 3,000 shares held jointly with his wife and 6,705 shares owned directly.

(9)Includes 7,70540,000 shares owned directly, 800 shares held by a trust of which he is a trustee and principal beneficiary, and the following shares in which he disclaims beneficial ownership: 133 shares held by his daughter and 800 shares held by a trust of which he is a trustee.

(10)

(5)

Represents 3,900shares held directly.

(6)

Includes 2,000 shares held jointly with his wife and 24,138 shares owned directly.

(7)

Includes 3,000 shares held jointly with his wife and 22,131 shares owned directly.

(8)

Represents 3,612 shares held directly and 1,7494,929 RSUs that will vest within sixty days.

(11)

(9)

Represents 1,776,604 shares owned by Altor Fund II GP Limited. Mr. Strömholm is a partner at Altor Equity Partners AB, which is an investment advisor to Altor Fund II GP Limited. Mr. Strömholm is also an owner of and indirect investor in Altor Fund II GP Limited.

(12)Includes 42,889 shares owned directly and the following shares in which he disclaims beneficial ownership: 1,437,241 shares owned by The Louis Berkman Investment Company, 13,767 shares owned by his wife and 1,266 shares held by the Louis and Sandra Berman Foundation, of which he is a trustee.

(13)Excludes double counting of shares deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one director.

(10)  Represents 21,036 shares held directly. Mr. Stanik retired from the Corporation on June 30, 2018.  

Unless otherwise indicated, the individuals named have sole investment and voting power.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Corporation’s directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Corporation’s common stock, to file reports of holdings and transactions in


the Corporation’s common stock with the SEC and to furnish the Corporation with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file. Based on those records and other information furnished, during 2015,2018, executive officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Corporation’s common stock complied with all filing requirements.


PROPOSAL TO AMEND OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF THE CORPORATION’S COMMON STOCK FROM 20,000,000 SHARES TO 40,000,000 SHARES

(Proposal 2)

On March 6, 2019, the Board of directors approved a proposal to amend our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles of Incorporation”) to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 20,000,000 to 40,000,000.

The proposed amendment would replace the first sentence of Article FIFTH of the Articles of Incorporation with the following language:

“The authorized capital stock of the Corporation shall be 3,000,000 shares of Preference Stock, without par value, and 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the par value of $1 per share.”

A copy of the proposed amendment is attached hereto as Annex A (the “Amendment”).

Effect of Increase in Authorized Shares

Following the effectiveness of the increase in authorized shares, current holders of common stock will own the same number of shares of common stock than prior to the increase. The Amendment will not change the terms of the common stock and the additional shares of common stock to be authorized pursuant to the Amendment would have rights identical to the currently outstanding common stock of the Corporation. The Amendment will not affect the rights of current holders of the company’s common stock, none of whom have preemptive or similar rights to acquire the newly authorized shares.  Each shareholder’s percentage ownership of outstanding common stock will not be altered. The par value of the common stock will not change, and the outstanding common stock will remain fully paid and non-assessable. 

Purposes of the Articles Amendment Proposal

Article FIFTH of the Articles of Incorporation authorizes the Corporation to issue 20,000,000 shares of common stock.  The authorization was established in 1985.  

As of March 12, 2019, the record date for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders:

(i)

12,494,846 shares of common stock are issued and outstanding;

(ii)

797,854 shares are issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and upon vesting of restricted stock units; and

(iii)

760,375 unallocated shares of common stock are available for future awards under the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

The Board believes it is in the best interest of the Corporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock in order to give the Corporation greater flexibility and responsiveness in considering and planning for future corporate needs, including, but not limited to, stock dividends, grants under equity compensation plans, stock splits, financing activities, potential strategic transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, and business combinations, as well as other general corporate transactions. The Board believes that additional authorized shares of common stock will enable the company to take timely advantage of market conditions and other opportunities that become available to the Corporation without the delay and expense associated with convening a special meeting of the Corporation’s shareholders.


Potential Risks Associated with the Amendment

The Corporation has no current plan, commitment, arrangement, understanding or agreement regarding the issuance of the additional shares of common stock that will result from the Corporation’s adoption of the Amendment.  On September 27, 2018 the Corporation filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC in connection with the possible offering of subscription rights to our existing common shareholders to purchase units consisting of shares of common stock and warrants (the “Potential Offering”).  On November 5, 2018 the Corporation announced a postponement of the Potential Offering.  While the Corporation has no current plan or binding commitments for any transactions at this time, there can be no assurance that the Corporation will not undertake the Potential Offering or any other transaction in the future.  If the Amendment is approved, the Corporation may use some of the shares of common stock that would become available for issuance as a result for the Potential Offering or other potential transactions involving equity securities.

Except as otherwise required by law or by a regulation of the New York Stock Exchange, the newly authorized shares of common stock will be available for issuance at the discretion of the Board (without further action by the shareholders) for various future corporate needs, including those outlined above. While adoption of the Amendment would not have any immediate dilutive effect on the proportionate voting power or other rights of the Corporation’s existing shareholders, any future issuance of additional authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock may, among other things, dilute the earnings per share and book value of the common stock and the voting rights of those holding common stock at the time the additional shares are issued.

In addition to the corporate purposes mentioned above, an increase in the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock may make it more difficult to, or discourage an attempt to, obtain control of the Corporation by means of a takeover bid that the board of directors determines is not in the best interest of the Corporation and its shareholders, as additional shares of common stock could be issued to dilute the stock ownership and voting power of, or increase the cost to, a party seeking to obtain control of the Corporation. However, the Board of directors is not aware of any attempt or plan to obtain control of the Corporation.

Vote Required

Since all members of the Board of Directors have voted “FOR” the Articles Amendment Proposal, the approval by the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares, voting together as a single class, is required to adopt the Articles Amendment Proposal.

If the Amendment is approved, it will become effective upon its filing with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, which will occur as soon as practicable after the approval.

The board recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to approve the amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock FROM 20,000,000 SHARES TO 40,000,000 SHARES.



ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVEEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


(Proposal 2)

3)

The Say-on-Pay vote is advisory and therefore not binding on the Corporation or the Board. However, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee will carefully review the opinions that our shareholders express and will take the outcome of the vote into account when making decisions regarding executive compensation. Our Board of Directors adopted a policy to hold this advisory vote on executive compensation annually.

We believe that the Say-on-Pay vote represents an additional means by which we may obtain important feedback from our shareholders about executive compensation. As set forth in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”),Overview, the overall objectives of our executive compensation program are to provide compensation that is competitive, create a structure that is based on achievement of performance goals and provide incentive for long-term continued employment.

In accordance with the voting results for the proposal considered at the Corporation’s 20112017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders regarding the frequency of advisory Say-on-Pay votes, the Corporation determined to hold an advisory Say-on-Pay vote annually until the next shareholder vote on the frequency of such advisory Say-on-Pay votes. A shareholder vote on the frequency of such advisory Say-on-Pay votes is required to be held at least once every six years. Accordingly, the Corporation expects that the next such frequency vote will be in 2017.

Shareholders are encouraged to read the CD&A,Compensation Overview, starting on page 20,24, which discusses how the elements of the compensation packages for the named executive officers are determined, and review the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and narrative disclosuresinformation following the CD&A. After a shareholder outreach effort during 2014, we made significant changes to our executive compensation program during 2015 intended to further align our executive compensation payouts to our business performance, as explained in the CD&A.Summary Compensation Table. The Board and the Compensation Committee believe that thesethe Corporation’s policies and procedures on executive compensation are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders and are effective in achieving the strategic goals of the Corporation. The Say-on-Pay vote gives you, as a shareholder, the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our executive compensation program by voting for or against the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the “Corporation”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Corporation’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Corporation’s proxy statement for the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,Overview, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.”

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS RESOLUTION AND THEREBY ENDORSE THE CORPORATION’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM.



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONCOMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OVERVIEW

Our Compensation Discussion and AnalysisOverview describes the key features of our executive compensation program for 20152018 for our “named executive officers”:

20152018 Named Executive Officers

 

Name

Title (as of last day of 2015)2018)

J. Brett McBrayer

Chief Executive Officer (as of 7/1/2018)

John S. Stanik

Former Chief Executive Officer (until 6/30/2018)

Marliss D. Johnson

Michael G. McAuley

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Rose Hoover

President and Chief Administrative Officer

Robert G. CarothersChairman and Chief Executive Officer of Union Electric Steel Corporation
Terrence W. KennyPresident of Air & Liquid Systems Corporation

 

We have divided this discussion into five parts:

 

1.

2018 Highlights

1.2015 Highlights

 

2.

Key Features of Our Executive Compensation Program

 

3.

2015

2018 Compensation Objectives and Governance

 

4.

2018 Compensation Decisions

4.2015 Compensation Decisions

 

5.

Other Compensation Practices and Policies

2018 H2015 HighlightsIGHLIGHTS

 

Following our 2014 annual meeting, we engaged with certain of our institutional investors and evaluated feedback from leading proxy advisory services regarding our executive compensation program. After considering that feedback, we implemented several significant changes to our executive compensation program in 2015, all in an effort to better align executive pay with our business performance:

Feature

2014 Design

2015 Design

Annual

incentives

•For CEO and certain operational executives, based on a combination of business and personal performance

•For other executives, discretionary bonus awards

•For all named executive officers, 70% based on company and/or business unit operating income goals and 30% on individual performance goals

•Payouts range from 0% to 200% of target award, depending on performance

Long-term

incentives

•100% awarded as stock options

•70% awarded as performance stock units (PSUs) vesting over three years (2015-2017) based on a combination of annual EPS goals and 3-year cumulative TSR goals relative to peers

•Payouts range from 0% to 150% of target award, depending on performance

•30% awarded as time-vesting restricted stock units (RSUs), to balance performance with retention objectives

We described these changes in last year’s proxy statement. At the Corporation’s 2015 annual meeting of shareholders, we held an annual non-binding, advisory vote to approve our executive compensation. Approximately 96% of the votes cast were voted in favor of our executive compensation. The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (the “Committee”) considered this vote as a favorable review of the changes made and has not made additional changes to the program for 2016.

As a result of these changes, the 20152018 executive compensation program features a balanced mix of salary and performance-driven annual and long-term incentive award opportunities. The following chart below illustrates the target compensation opportunities in 20152018 for Mr. Stanik,McBrayer, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO,” and also referred to as our Principal Executive Officer or “PEO”): (note that the chart depicts the full annual opportunity, while Mr. McBrayer would only be eligible for the 50% of the total opportunity since his employment with the Corporation began on July 1, 2018).

 

LOGO

 

Throughout 2015,


Despite an [•] increase in total revenue from continuing operations, 2018 was a challenging year for the Corporation faced deteriorating end-market conditions in most ofCorporation.  Our Forged and Cast Engineered Products segment generated record sales to the industries it serves. Excess steel capacity, weakened demand for rolls, as well as declining prices for oil and gas contributedindustry but experienced a significant contraction in the second half of the year due to inventory corrections in the challenging market conditions. Intense international competition, coupled with a strong U.S. Dollarfrac block supply chain.  In addition, results from continuing operations in 2018 reflected several negative factors that impacted the segment, including higher costs of raw materials and a weak Euro, further added tokey production materials, key equipment reliability issues, resulting in shipment delays and maintenance costs and idle capacity at one of our cast roll plants. The Air and Liquid Processing segment performed well in 2018, increasing its revenue by approximately [•]%.

Overall, the significant headwinds. Faced with these difficult global economic conditions, the Corporation failed toForged and Cast Engineered Products segment did not achieve company-wide business goalsits 2018 goal related to income from operations, and earnings per share,a key metricsmetric in our compensation programs as discussed in more detail below. Ourprogram. The Air and Liquid Processing segment however, performed well and exceeded its target operating income goals.

goal. The Corporation was not able to achieve the adjusted earnings per share (“EPS”) goal.

Based on these business performance results, the named executive officers didforfeited a significant amount of compensation in 2018, which exhibits our pay-for-performance philosophy.  Specifically, the award related to the Forged and Cast Engineered Products segment income from operations was forfeited.  Further, because the 2018 EPS threshold goal was not receive anyachieved, the portion of the 2018 annual incentive award related to EPS was also forfeited. In addition, since the company-wide goals based on income from operations. As discussed further below, each of the named executive officers received limited annual incentive awards based on personal performance, and Mr. Kenney also received an award based on the Air and Liquid Processing segment operating income goals that were achieved. The 20152018 EPS threshold goal was not achieved, the portions of the 2016-2018 and the 2017-2019 performance stock unit (“PSU”) awards related to EPS were forfeited. The threshold for the 2015-2017 PSU awardsrelative total shareholder return (“TSR”) portion of the 2016-2018 PSUs was also not achieved, and as a result, that portion of the PSU awards2016-2018 PSUs was also forfeited. Together, these incentive compensation outcomes demonstrate the close linkage of ourThe named executive officer compensationofficers did receive annual incentive awards related to the Air and businessLiquid Systems segment income from operations. Each of the named executive officers also received annual incentive awards based on personal performance.


Key Features of our Executive Compensation ProgramKEY FEATURESOFOUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

 

The

Our Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation program including the 2015 design changes, includes key features that align the interests of our named executive officers and the Corporation’s long-term strategic direction with the interests of our shareholders and does not include features that could misalign their interests.

 

KEY FEATURES

 

KEY FEATURES

•     Align CEO Pay with CompanyCorporate Performance:

A significant portion of our CEO’s actual pay is tied to annual performance goals and long-term shareholder returns. Beginning in 2015, aA majority of long-term incentive awards were provided as performance-based PSUs.

•     Use Long-Term Incentives to Link a Significant Portion of Named Executive Officer Pay to Company Performance:

A significant portion of pay for our named executive officers is long-term incentives linked to growing earnings per share and total shareholder return and our stock price.return.

•     Balance Short-Term and Long-Term Incentives:

Our incentive programs provide an appropriate balance of annual and long-term incentives and include multiple measures of performance.

•     Cap Incentive Awards:

Annual incentive awards and PSUs include capped payouts (200% for annual incentives and 150% for PSUs).

•     Mitigate Excessive Risk-taking Behaviors by Named Executive Officers:

Our executive compensation program includes features that reduce the possibility of our named executive officers, either individually or as a group, making excessively risky business decisions that could maximize short-term results at the expense of long-term value.

•     Authorize the Board to Claw Back Executive Compensation:

We have implemented a clawback policy applicable to executive officers pursuant to which, if the Corporation is required, because of fraud or negligence, to restate financial results for any Restatement Period in a manner that would have adversely affected the amount of the payout of any incentive compensation awards, the Committee has the right during the three-year period following the Restatement Period to review the matter and determine what, if any, repayment executives will be required to make.

•     Use of Independent Compensation Consultant:

In 2015,2018, the Committee engaged Pay Governance LLC, a compensation consulting firm, to assist it in fulfilling its responsibilities and duties. Pay Governance LLC does not provide any other services to the Corporation.

•     Use of Peer Group:

The Compensation Committee periodically checks its compensation decisions against executive compensation at a peer group of comparably-sized manufacturing companies comparable in terms of the primary scope metric of revenue and secondary scope metrics of market cap, assets and number of employees to ensure that our executive compensation program provides competitive compensation opportunities. The same peer group is used to determine our relative performance for vesting of a portion of performance share unitPSU awards.

•     Multi-Year Vesting Periods:

The equity awards granted to our executive officers are earned over multi-year periods, consistent with current practice and our retention objectives.

•     Use of Performance Metrics:

A significant portion of each executive’s annual pay is based on objective performance metrics. Our executive compensation program is designed so that a significant portion of compensation is “at-risk” based on corporate performance, as well as equity-based to align the interests of our executive officers and shareholders.

•     No Section 280G Tax Gross-Up Rights:

We do not provide any Code Section 280G excise tax gross-up rights or any other significant tax gross-up rights to our executive officers.

•     No Option Repricing or Replacement without Shareholder Approval:

The Corporation’s 20112016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (and the proposed new 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan) prohibits “underwater” options from being repriced or replaced (either with new options or other equity awards), unless approved by our shareholders.


2018 COMPENSATION OBJECTIVES

2015 Compensation Objectives and Governance

 

The compensation paid or awarded to our named executive officers for 20152018 was designed to meet the following objectives:

Provide compensation that is competitive with compensation for executive officers providing comparable services, taking into account the size of the Corporation, the nature of its business, and the location of its headquarters. We refer to this objective as “competitive compensation.”

Create a compensation structure under which a meaningful portion of total compensation is based on achievement of performance goals relating to the Corporation’s and the individuals’ performance and to enhancement of shareholder value. We refer to this objective as the “performance incentives.incentive.

Provide an incentive for long-term continued employment with us. We refer to this objective as the “retention incentives.incentive.

We consideredbelieve various components of our 20152018 compensation payments and awards (added to payments and awards granted in prior years) to meet these objectives as follows:the following objectives:

 

Type of Compensation

Objectives Addressed

Type of CompensationSalary

Objectives Addressed

Salary

Competitive Compensation

Performance Incentives

Incentive Bonus Plan Awards

Competitive Compensation

Performance Incentives

Restricted Stock Units

Competitive Compensation

Retention Incentives

Performance Stock Units

Competitive Compensation

Performance Incentives

Retention Incentives

Change in Control Severance Protection

Competitive Compensation

Retention Incentives

SERP Benefits

Competitive Compensation

Retention Incentives

 

In 2015,2018, compensation decisions for our CEO were made by the recommendation of theCompensation Committee and approved by the independent directors on the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee, in consultation with the CEO, makes recommendationsmade a recommendation to ourthe Board of Directors with regardrespect to director compensation and compensation of executive officers who report directly to the CEO, including each of the other named executive officers. In assessing competitive compensation, the Committee relied primarily on recommendations provided by Pay Governance LLC as the Committee’s outsideindependent compensation consultants.

2018 C2015 Compensation DecisionsOMPENSATION DECISIONS

 

Salaries

Salaries

New salary levels for our named executive officers historically have beenwere established on an annual basis in MayApril of each year.2018, except that Mr. Stanik’s salary was not changed due to his planned departure from the Corporation upon his retirement. Determinations regarding salary adjustments are made based on a number of objective and subjective factors, including cost of living increases, the Corporation’s financial performance, and a qualitative analysis of each individual officer’s performance during the preceding year, taking into account such factors as leadership, commitment and execution of corporate initiatives and special projects assigned by the Board, the Chairman or the CEO. We also consider whether there has been any material change in the officer’s title, duties and responsibilities in the preceding year. Where an officer has assumed material additional duties, or has been promoted, an above-normal salary adjustment would typically be justified. Finally, in rare circumstances, we

may decide to make a market adjustment in salaries if we determine that salary levels for one or more of our named executive officers have fallen materially below levels that we consider appropriate in order to maintain a competitive compensation package and to discourage valued executives from leaving to pursue other opportunities. Salary adjustments for our CEO and other named executive officers are reviewed


and must be approved by the independent members of the Board of Directors, after a recommendation by the Compensation Committee.

Generally, the differences in the level of pay between the named executive officers is the result of the determination by the Committee or by the CEO over time ofthat the level of responsibility, function, experience, and length of service that each of the officers possess.

The base salary determinations for each named executive officer in 20152018 were as follows:

 

Name

 

2018 Base

Pre-Adjustment

Salary($)

 

 

2018 Base

Adjusted

Salary($)

 

 

Percentage

Increase

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

n/a

 

 

 

550,000

 

 

n/a

 

John S. Stanik

 

 

630,000

 

 

 

630,000

 

 

0%

 

Michael G. McAuley

 

 

348,000

 

 

 

358,400

 

 

3%

 

Rose Hoover

 

 

375,000

 

 

 

384,400

 

 

3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

  2015 Base
Pre-Adjustment
Salary
   2015 Base
Adjusted
Salary
 Percentage
Increase
 

John S. Stanik

  $550,000    $600,000(1)   9.09

Robert G. Carothers

  $401,315    $408,815    1.87

Rose Hoover

  $318,576    $350,000(2)   9.86

Terrence W. Kenny

  $305,472    $312,972    2.46

Marliss D. Johnson

  $249,780    $259,780    4.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)At Mr. Stanik’s request, his base salary increase was delayed until 1/1/2016.

(2)Ms. Hoover’s salary was increased to $350,000 effective as of August 1, 2015, in connection with her promotion to President of the Corporation.

Key Incentive Plan Changes in 2018

In 2017, our Compensation Committee conducted a comprehensive review of the design of both the annual incentive and the long-term incentive plans and made certain changes which became effective in 2018. The Committee believes that the new design will continue to provide performance-based compensation opportunities tied to measurable performance goals that will drive long-term shareholder value.

The 2018 changes to the Annual Incentive Bonus Plan Awardsinclude:

The annual incentive is based 70% on the business performance and 30% on individual performance. With respect to the 70% business performance portion, 50% of it will be based on operating income and 50% - on the Corporation’s EPS.

For the executives at the corporate level, the operating income portion of the annual incentive is based on the performance of both business segments of the Corporation. For business segment leaders, 100% of the operating income portion of the annual incentive will be based on the performance of the relevant segment.

The 2018 changes to the Long-Term Incentive Plan include:

The long-term incentive awards continue to be based on a mix of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and PSUs. However, the RSUs will be weighted 33% of the total long-term incentive opportunity and PSUs will be weighted 67% of the total long-term incentive opportunity. With respect to the PSUs, 50% of the PSUs will be based on Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”) and 50% will be based on relative TSR, each of which will be measured over a three-year performance period.

The Compensation Committee believes that moving the EPS metric from the long-term incentive into the annual incentive ensures that all participants are focused on improving the Corporation’s EPS. In addition, replacing the EPS


portion of the long-term incentive with ROIC puts emphasis on the improvement of long-term returns on capital, rather than short-term EPS.

 

Annual Incentive Plan  

The annual incentive bonus plan award for 20152018 for each named executive offices followedofficer was determined using the following formula:

Target Annual IncentivePerformance

      X

X

35% Weighting

    X

70% WeightingX

Business Segment Performance Achievement

     =

=

Business Performance Portion of Annual Incentive

     +

+

Target Annual IncentivePerformance

      X

X

35% Weighting

    X

Corporate EPS

     =

Corporate EPS Portion of Annual Incentive

     +

Target Annual Performance

      X

30% Weighting

    X

X

Personal Goal Achievement to Improve Their Area of Responsibility

=

Personal Performance Portion of Annual Incentive

 

 

_______________________

Annual Incentive Award

Threshold, target and maximum goalslevels were set for the performance goals, such that no amount would be paid for performance below threshold, 50% of target would be paid for performance at threshold, and no more than 200% of target would be paid for performance at or above maximum.

  In addition, if the threshold level of Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) is not achieved, payouts for the achievement of personal goals are capped at the target level.

Target Annual Incentive Awards. Target annual incentive awards were established by the Compensation Committee as a percentage of base salary for each named executive officer, intending to provide a competitive bonus opportunity aligned to the named executive officer’s role, responsibilities and historic pay, as follows:

 

Name

 

Target Annual

Incentive

As % of Base Salary

 

 

Target

Annual

Incentive

Amount

 

J. Brett McBrayer(1)

 

75%

 

 

$

412,500

 

John S. Stanik

 

85%

 

 

$

535,500

 

Michael G. McAuley

 

50%

 

 

$

174,000

 

Rose Hoover

 

50%

 

 

$

187,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

  Target
As % of Base  Salary
 Target
Amount
 

John S. Stanik

   43.33 $238,315  

Marliss D. Johnson

   30.00 $74,934  

Rose Hoover

   45.00 $143,359  

Robert G. Carothers

   46.00 $184,603  

Terrence W. Kenny

   35.00 $106,915  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Mr. McBrayer’s annual incentive is to be pro-rated for 6 months only (to $206,225) since his employment began on July 1, 2018.

Business Performance Goals (Weighted 70%35%). For Mr. Stanik, Ms. Johnson and Ms. Hoover,The business performance portion of the annual incentive was based on goals related to the Corporation’s 2015 income from operations achieved by the two business segments of the Corporation, the Forged and Cast Engineered Products Segment (weighted at 25%) and the Air and Liquid Processing Segment (weighted at 10%), as compared to the Corporation’ssegments’ business planplans for 2015.2018. Income from operations was chosen by the Compensation Committee in the belief that it is the most accurate objective measure of business performance. The Compensation Committee eliminates most charges or windfalls which are generally beyond the control of the executives and adjusts actual and planned income to allow for the exclusion, for example, of costs primarilycost changes related to asbestos litigation, adjustments for acquisitions or divestitures, changes in accounting standards, and acquisition revenue and expense.other similar changes.


Business Segment

Operating Income Goals for 2018 (in $000’s)

 

Forged and Cast

Engineered Products

Segment (25% weight)

 

 

Air and Liquid

Processing

Segment (10% weight)

 

 

Performance

Achievement Level

 

Payout

Percentage

(of Target

Award)

 

Less than 7,000

 

 

Less than 8,000

 

 

Below Threshold

 

0%

 

7,000

 

 

 

8,000

 

 

Threshold

 

50%

 

13,921

 

 

 

10,112

 

 

Target

 

100%

 

 

20,000

 

 

 

12,000

 

 

Maximum

 

200%

 

 

For Mr. Carothers and Mr. Kenny, asCorporate EPS (Weighted 35%).  The Corporate EPS portion of the leaders of our two key business segments, business performanceannual incentive was based 2/7ths (i.e., 20%on the 2018 earnings per share of the total annual incentive award opportunity) onCorporation.  For this purpose, “EPS” means the Corporation’s 2015net income from operationsper common share (basic) for each year during the performance period, adjusted as determined by the Committee to exclude the effect of certain items, such as asset write-downs or impairment charges, litigation or claim costs, judgments or settlements, including asbestos claims and 5/7ths (i.e., 50%defense costs; and the effect of the total annual incentive award opportunity) on business segment operating income goals. The Committee believed that this weighting would provide greater focus for these named executive officers on business segment performance over which the named executive officer has primary responsibility, balanced by an interestchanges in overall corporatetax laws, accounting principles or other laws or provisions affecting reported results.

  

The following table shows the relevant goals and payout percentages for 2015. The overall corporate-level goals are lower than the sumEPS portion of the business segment goals because corporate-level operating income is reduced by certain expenses not included in determining business segment operating income.design.

Corporate EPS Performance Goals

 

Corporate and Business Segment

Operating Income Goals for 2015 (in $000’s)

  Percentage of
Business Plan
 Performance
Achievement Level
  Payout
Percentage

(of Target
Award)

Corporate-Level

(all NEOs)

  Forged and Cast
Engineered Products
Segment

(Mr. Carothers)
  Air and  Liquid
Processing

Segment
(Mr. Kenny)
     

Less than 7,358

  Less than 8,013  Less than 5,822  Less than 75% Below Threshold  0%

7,358

  8,013  5,822  75% Threshold  50%

9,811

  10,684  7,763  100% Target  100%

13,735 and above

  14,958  10,868  140% Maximum  200%

Achievement

 

% of EPS Portion

Target Earned

 

 

2018 EPS

Goals

 

 

Below Threshold

 

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Threshold

 

75%

 

 

$

-0.26

 

 

Target

 

100%

 

 

$

0.26

 

 

Maximum

 

150%

 

 

$

0.52

 

 

 

Personal Performance Goals (Weighted 30%). The Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board approved, personal performance goals for each of the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee ultimately exercises informed judgment without a specific formula, in determining the degree to which individual performance goals are achieved. The following table summarizes the areas of personal performance considered material to the 2015 annual incentive awards:

Name

Key Personal Performance Goals

John S. StanikDevelopment of strategic plan; product profitability analysis; expense review; employee productivity; business development program; talent development
Marliss D. JohnsonImprovements to accounting/finance department; product profitability analysis; development of strategic plan; investment alternative and tax planning strategies
Rose HooverEnterprise risk management projects; talent development and succession planning; other strategic projects
Robert G. CarothersMarket evaluations for development of strategic plan; business segment growth and strategic goals
Terrence W. KennyMarket evaluations for development of strategic plan; product profitability analysis; business segment strategic goals; talent development and succession planning

 

20152018 Annual Incentive Award Decisions Based on Performance. The Corporation had a loss from operations for 2015 of $9,300,000 (excluding asbestos-related proceeds of $14,333,000 received from two insurance carriers), which was below the threshold level of performance for the year, resulting in no payout for that portion of the 2015 annual incentive awards. The Forged and Cast Engineered Products segment had an

operating loss for 2015 of $3,444,0002018, which was below the threshold level of performance for that business segment, resulting in no payout for that portion of the 20152018 annual incentive award for Mr. Carothers.the named executive officers. The Air and Liquid Processing segment had ansegment’s operating income, of $8,833,000, whichas adjusted, exceeded the target level of performance, resulting in athe payment above target but below maximum for that portion of the 20152018 annual incentive award for Mr. Kenny. After a reviewthe named executive officers. The Corporation did not meet its 2018 EPS goal, resulting in no payout for that portion of individual performancethe annual incentive award for the yearnamed executive officers.  Lastly, the named executive officers earned varying levels of payouts based on their personal performance in 2018 against previously determined goals (with no payout exceeding a target level, since the goals noted above,2018 EPS goal was not met, as required by the Committee recommended andterms of the Boardannual incentive program).  The Compensation Committee approved the following annual incentive awards for the named executive officers for 2015,2018, which are included in the Summary Compensation Table for 20152018 under “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation”:

 

Name  

Target Annual

 Incentive Award 

   

Business
Performance
Portion

 (70% weighting) 

   +   

Personal
Performance
Portion

 (30% weighting) 

   =  

Actual

 Annual Incentive 

Award

 

 

Target Annual

Incentive Award

 

 

Business

Performance

Portion

(70% weighting)

 

 

+

 

Personal

Performance

Portion

(30% weighting)

 

 

=

 

Actual

Annual Incentive

Award

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

$

412,500

 

 

$

28,380

 

 

 

 

$

61,875

 

 

 

 

$

90,255

 

John S. Stanik(1)

  $238,315    $0     +    $103,600       $103,600  

 

$

535,500

 

 

$

36,842

 

 

+

 

$

35,745

 

 

 

 

$

72,587

 

Marliss D. Johnson

  $74,934    $0     +    $20,000       $20,000  

Michael G. McAuley

 

$

174,000

 

 

$

24,658

 

 

+

 

$

53,760

 

 

 

 

$

78,418

 

Rose Hoover

  $143,359    $0     +    $66,000       $66,000  

 

$

187,500

 

 

$

26,447

 

 

+

 

$

57,660

 

 

 

 

$

84,107

 

Robert G. Carothers

  $184,603    $0     +    $79,000       $79,000  

Terrence W. Kenny

  $106,915    $78,000     +    $50,000       $128,000  

 

Discretionary Bonuses. The Committee made additional discretionary bonus awards(1) Pursuant to the Retirement and Consulting Agreement between Mr. Stanik and the Corporation Mr. Stanik is entitled to a payment of a pro rata portion of his short-term incentive award for 2015 to Mr. Stanik,the 2018 fiscal year, in the amount of $25,000, and$72,587, which is to Ms. Hoover,be paid to him in the amount2019 in shares of $15,000. The Committee made the bonus award to Mr. Stanik based on its reviewcommon stock of his leadership in a number of important positive changes to the Corporation, during 2015, including his efforts in the acquisitions of the Åkers Group and Alloys Unlimited and Processing, Inc. and the centralization of the Corporation’s back office. The Committee made the bonus award to Ms. Hoover primarily based on her efforts related to certain insurance matters and in managing the acquisition of the Åkers Group.rather than cash.    

 

Long-Term Incentive Awards

Plan

The Corporation sponsorshas adopted the 20112016 Omnibus Incentive Plan under which the Compensation Committee may grant the named executive officers and other key employees a variety of types of equity-based awards. See Proposal 3 for a proposal to approve the Corporation’s 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan to replace the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee believes that annual grants of equity-based awards serve the purpose of aligning the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our long-term shareholders. Vesting conditions for equity-based awards also encourage executive retention. Before 2015, the Corporation had the practice of making annual grants of stock options. As discussed below, beginning inSince 2015, the Compensation Committee has not granted stock options and instead has begunfollows a practice of granting long-term incentivesincentive awards in the form of annual grants of PSUs (vesting based on performance over a three-year performance period) and time-vesting RSUs.RSUs (vesting based on continued employment over three years). The Compensation Committee believes this newthe current mix of equity incentive awards further ties pay to our Corporation’s performance while also aligning interests with our long-term shareholders and encouraging retention.

Target Award Amounts. The Compensation Committee sets a target dollar amount for the value of long-term incentive awards granted each year. These target amounts are set as a percentage of base salary for each named executive officer,year, intending to provide a competitive long-term incentive award opportunity aligned to the named executive officer’s role, responsibilities and historic pay, as follows:

 

Name

  Target
As % of Base  Salary
 Target
Amount
 

 

Target Long-Term

Incentive

As % of Base Salary

 

 

Target

Long-Term

Incentive

Amount

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

110.0%

 

 

$

605,000

 

John S. Stanik

   50.00 $275,000  

 

105.1%

 

 

$

662,000

 

Marliss D. Johnson

   40.00 $99,912  

Michael G. McAuley

 

56.92%

 

 

$

204,000

 

Rose Hoover

   50.00 $159,288  

 

71.54%

 

 

$

275,000

 

Robert G. Carothers

   50.00 $200,655  

Terrence W. Kenny

   45.00 $137,462  

Whether the named executive officers realize these target amounts depends on our Corporation’s businessfinancial results and stock price performance and the executive’s continued employment with us.

Mix of Awards: PSUs and RSUs. Beginning in 2015, the Compensation Committee determined that the long-term incentive awards for the named executive officers should be provided in a balanced mix of time-vesting RSUs, weighted 30%, and performance-vesting PSUs, weighted 70%. For 2018, the Compensation Committee adjusted the weighting to be 33% in RSUs and 67% in PSUs.  This weighting, and the performance requirements for PSUs discussed below, is intended to further align the compensation realized by our named executive officers over time with ourthe Corporation’s performance. The PSUs, to the extent earned based on performance, do not vest until the end of the performance period, and the RSUs vest in three equal annual installments starting on the first anniversary of the grant date, to further encourage executive retention. Consistent with past practice, the grants are effective atmade on or about the same date as our annual meeting of shareholders for theeach year.

Performance Design for PSUs. PSUs become earned based on the Corporation’s performance over a three-year performance period, 2015-2017.2018-2020. The Compensation Committee determined that the performance vesting conditions should be based on a mix of our performance against annually determined goals regarding earnings per share (EPS),ROIC, weighted 4/7ths (or 40%34% of the total long-term incentive award opportunity including(including the RSUs), and our total stockholder return (TSR)TSR as compared against a peer group over the performance period, weighted 3/7ths (or 30%33% of the total long-term incentive award opportunity including(including the RSUs). The ROIC (calculated as net income divided by the sum of average total debt and shareholders’ equity) performance is measured as percentage point improvement in the Corporation’s ROIC in 2020 versus ROIC in 2017, subject to certain adjustments for mergers and acquisitions, restructurings, foreign exchange fluctuations and accounting changes, among other, which the Committee believes that EPS performance reflects efficient earnings performance against our equity base, and thatdeems appropriate.  TSR performance ensures that compensation results are tied to our relative performance against our peers. Because of the inherent challenge in setting EPS goals over a three-year period and to better ensure appropriately challenging goals, the Committee determined that the EPS portion of the award should be set at the beginning of each performance year during the three-year period.

 

The following table shows the EPS portion of theROIC design.


EPSROIC Performance Goals1

(40%34% of Total Long-Term Incentive Award Opportunity)

Achievement

 

ROIC Target Improvement

 

% of ROIC Portion

Target Earned

 

Below Threshold

 

less than 5%

 

0%

 

Threshold

 

5%

 

50%

 

Target

 

10%

 

100%

 

Maximum

 

15%

 

200%

 

 

Achievement  

    % of EPS Portion

Target Earned

  

2015 EPS

Goals

  2016 EPS
Goals
  2017  EPS
Goals

Below Threshold

  0%  Less than $0.37      

Threshold

  75%  $0.37  TBD  TBD

Target

  100%  $0.49  TBD  TBD

Maximum

  150%  $0.74 or more  TBD  TBD

1For this purpose, EPS means the Corporation’s net income per common share (basic) for each year during the performance period, adjusted as determined by the Committee to exclude the effect of certain items such as asset write-downs or impairment charges, litigation or claim costs, judgments or settlements, including asbestos claims and defense costs; and the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles or other laws or provisions affecting reported results.

The following table shows the relative TSR design. TSR includes cumulative cash dividends (without interest) declared during the performance period. To guard against stock price volatility, the beginning and ending stock prices for determining relative TSR are based on an 11-day average using the closing price on the applicable date +/-5 trading days.

Relative TSR Performance Goals

(30%33% of Total Long-Term Incentive Award Opportunity)

 

Achievement

Achievement

TSR Percentile Rank

% of TSR Portion

Target Earned

Below Threshold

Below 25th percentile

0%

Threshold

25th percentile

75%

50%

Target

50th percentile

100%

Maximum

75th percentile and above

150%

200%

 

The peer companies for this purpose selected by the Compensation Committee are the same as used by the Compensation Committee to view the competitiveness of our executive compensation program, as discussed further below.

For each of the EPSROIC and relative TSR performance goals, results between threshold and target or between target and maximum are interpolated on a straight-line basis.

2015 EPS2018 Results for PSUs.  The relative TSR for the 2016-2018 PSUs performed below the 25th percentile, and as a result that portion of the 2016-2018 PSUs was forfeited.  ROIC improvement is measured over a three-year period, therefore, no PSUs will be awarded for 2018 for the ROIC portion of the award.  As described above, prior to 2018, a portion of long-term incentive awards was tied to the Corporation’s EPS.  For 2015,2018, our EPS for purposes of the 2015-2017outstanding PSU awards was $(0.36) per share. Because this result was below the threshold goal set for year 2018 ($(.26)), therefore, the portion of the 2016-2018 PSUs and 2017-2019 PSUs related to 2015the 2018 EPS was forfeited.

OTHER COMPENSATION PRACTICES AND POLICIES

 

Other Compensation Practices and Policies

 

See “Key Features of Our Executive Compensation Program” above for a summary of a number of key policies and practices designed to result in a balanced executive compensation program that encourages appropriate, and not excessive, levels of risk taking by our named executive officers. Below are certain additional policies and practices regarding our program:

Use of Peer Companies

The Compensation Committee periodically checks its compensation decisions against executive compensation at a peer group of comparably-sized manufacturing companies comparable in terms of the primary scope metric of revenue and secondary scope metrics of market cap, assets and number of employees to ensure that our executive compensation program provides competitive compensation opportunities for our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee uses this information for general context on executive compensation practices and levels in the market and does not have a formal policy to formally benchmark compensation mix or levels for the named executive officers to a specified competitive level against these peers.

The Compensation Committee most recently considered the appropriate peer companies in 2014.2018. At that time,


the Compensation Committee approved a list of 17 peer manufacturing companies, taking into account size and complexity of the business based on revenue, total assets and enterprise value.market cap. At the time established, the Corporation approximated the median size of the peer companies in revenues, was above-medianabove the median in assets and below 25th percentilemedian in enterprise value.market cap. The peer company list approved in 20142018 is as follows:

 

Badger Meter Inc.

Calgon CarbonChase Corporation

Chase CorporationDMC Global Inc.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc.

Dynamic Materials Corp.

FreightCar America Inc.

Gorman-Rupp Co.

Hardinge Inc.

Horsehead Holding Corp.Haynes International, Inc.

Hurco Companies Inc.

Insteel Industries, Inc.

Kadant Inc.

LB Foster Co.

Lydall Inc.

Manitex International, Inc.

NN Inc.

Twin Disc, Incorporated

Universal Stainless &

Alloy Products Inc.

Ongoing and Post-Employment Agreements

In 2018, the Board of Directors adopted the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation Executive Severance Plan (the “Executive Severance Plan”) for key executive officers of the Corporation other than the CEO (whose severance benefits are addressed in his offer letter).  We also have several plans and agreementsa legacy supplemental executive retirement plan that enableenables certain of our named executive officers to accrue retirement benefits as the executives continueexecutive continues to work for us, and oneas well as change in control agreements that could provide severance benefits upon a change in control. These plans and agreements have been adopted and/or amended at various times over many years, and they are designed to be a part of a competitive compensation package. The plans and agreements described below do not include plans that are generally available to all of our salaried employees:

Executive Severance Plan — The Board has adopted the Executive Severance Plan which provides severance benefits to key executive officers of the Corporation, other than the CEO, in the event of a termination by the Corporation without “cause” or by a participant for “good reason”.  The named executive officers who participate in the Executive Severance Plan are Mr. Michael G. McAuley and Ms. Rose Hoover.  The Executive Severance Plan is described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”)—We maintain a supplemental executive retirement plan,SERP, which is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that provides benefits for executives in excess of the benefits that may be provided under our tax qualified defined benefit retirement plan (“Plan”) as a result of limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. The SERP also provides additional payment rights and benefits in the event of a change in control. All of ourThe only named executive officers, except Mr. Carothers and Mr. Stanik, participateofficer who participates in a SERP. See the SERP is Ms. Rose Hoover.  The SERP is described under “Retirement Benefits” table and accompanying narrative for a description of the SERP.below.

 

Union Electric Steel Retirement Restoration Plan (“RR Plan”)—Union Electric Steel Corporation maintains a Retirement Restoration Plan for Mr. Carothers which is an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan that provides benefits for Mr. Carothers that would otherwise be payable to him by the Plan but for limitations on the amount of his earnings imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. See the Retirement Benefits table and accompanying narrative for a description of the RR Plan.

Change in Control Agreements—Agreements — We have change in control agreements with respect to each of our named executive officers so that our officers remain focused on the interests of the Corporation and the shareholders, rather than their personal circumstances, in the context of a potential change in control rather than their personal circumstances.control. Our agreements with executives provide for payments and other benefits only if we terminate an executive’s employment without cause or if the executive terminates employment for “good reason” within 24 months following a change in control. The changeChange in controlControl agreements are described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

Tax Considerations

Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) limits the deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to any one named executive officer in any calendar year. Under the tax rules in effect before 2018, compensation that qualified as “performance-based” under Section 162(m) was deductible without regard to this $1 million limit. However, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law December 22, 2017, eliminated this performance-based compensation exception effective January 1, 2018, subject to a publicly held corporationspecial rule that “grandfathers” certain awards and arrangements that were in effect on or before November 2, 2017. As a result, compensation that the Compensation Committee structured in 2017 and prior years with the intent of qualifying as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) that is paid on or after January 1, 2018 may not deduct more thanbe fully deductible, depending on the application of the special grandfather rules. Moreover, from and after January 1, 2018, compensation awarded in excess of $1 million into our named executive officers generally will not be deductible. Given our current compensation levels, the potential impact of Section 162(m) has not been a taxable yearmaterial consideration for certain formsthe Committee. While the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act


may limit the deductibility of compensation paid to the chief executive officer and certain other named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table (other thanfuture, the chief financial officer). Our policy is generally to preserveCommittee will—consistent with its past practice—design compensation programs that are in the federal income taxbest long-term interests of the Corporation and our shareholders, with deductibility of compensation paid to our executives. Nevertheless, we retain the flexibility to authorize compensation that may not be deductible if we believe it is in the best interestsbeing one of our Corporation. While we believe that all compensation paid to our executives in 2015 was deductible, a portionvariety of compensation paid in future years may not be deductible as a result of Section 162(m).

considerations taken into account.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Summary compensation information for our named executive officers for 20152018 is set forth in the following table:

 

(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)  (i)  (j) 

Name and Principal Position

 Year
($)
  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  Option
Awards
($)(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(3)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
  Total ($) 

PEO—John S. Stanik,

  2015    550,000    25,000    201,659    0    103,600    17,612    32,274    962,419  

Chief Executive Officer

         

PFO—Marliss D. Johnson,

  2015    256,446    0    73,261    0    20,000    41,640    10,763    402,110  

Chief Financial Officer

and Treasurer

  2014    231,053    60,000    —      62,900    —      390,502    27,318    771,773  
  2013    220,733    50,000    —      49,470    —      —      24,165    344,369  

Rose Hoover,

  2015    333,576    15,000    116,808    0    66,000    259,422    10,427    801,233  

President and Chief Administrative Officer

  2014    298,757    125,000    —      85,100    —      745,597    30,274    1,284,728  
  2013    285,413    116,000    —      66,930    —      51,033    31,255    550,631  

Robert G. Carothers,

  2015    402,556    0    147,123    0    79,000    155,851    18,211    802,741  

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of

Union Electric Steel Corporation

  2014    394,944    0    —      92,500    80,262    541,116    20,272    1,129,094  
  2013    377,300    0    —      72,750    133,770    35,029    16,927    635,776  
         
         

Terrence W. Kenny,

  2015    310,160    0    100,779    0    128,000    185,520    12,834    737,293  

President of Air & Liquid Systems Corporation

  2014    285,861    0    —      85,100    111,832    625,197    30,648    1,026,806  
  2013    273,093    0    —      66,930    110,654    —      21,317    471,994  

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

 

(d)

 

 

(e)

 

 

(f)

 

 

(g)

 

 

(h)

 

 

(i)

 

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

($)

 

Salary

($)

 

 

Bonus

($)

 

 

Stock

Awards

($)(1)

 

 

Non-Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compensation

($)

 

 

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

 

 

All Other

Compensation

($)(2)

 

 

Total ($)

 

PEO—J. Brett McBrayer

 

2018

 

 

275,004

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

429,772

 

 

 

90,255

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

258,555

 

 

 

1,153,586

 

     Chief Executive Officer (as of July 1, 2018)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PEO—John S. Stanik

 

2018

 

 

315,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

167,150

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

31,715

 

 

 

513,865

 

Chief Executive Officer (through June 30, 2018)

 

2017

 

 

627,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

595,168

 

 

 

476,803

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

30,242

 

 

 

1,729,213

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PFO—Michael G. McAuley,

 

2018

 

 

355,800

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

242,882

 

 

 

78,418

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

31,429

 

 

 

708,529

 

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial

 

2017

 

 

346,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

166,740

 

 

 

173,720

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

26,013

 

 

 

712,473

 

Officer and Treasurer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rose Hoover,

 

2018

 

 

382,050

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

319,340

 

 

 

84,107

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

23,102

 

 

 

808,599

 

President and Chief

 

2017

 

 

372,269

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

243,656

 

 

 

223,963

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

15,782

 

 

 

855,670

 

Administrative Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

(1)

The values set forth in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards of time-vesting restricted stock units (“RSUs”)RSUs and performance stock units (“PSUs”)PSUs pursuant to our 20112016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, consistent with the estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the service period determined as of the grant date under FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. AWith respect to awards made in 2018, a portion of the PSUs (40%(34% of the total target long-term incentive awards) becomes earned at the end of a three-year period, based on the percentage point improvement in the Corporation’s ROIC from 2017 to 2020, and the remaining portion (33% of the total target long-term incentive awards) becomes earned based on our relative TSR over the three-year performance period. For awards made prior to 2018, a portion of PSUs (40% of the total target long-term incentive) becomes earned based on annually set EPS goals for each of 2015, 2016 and 2017,year in the three-year performance period and the remaining portion (30% of the total target long-term incentive awards) becomes earned based on our relative TSR over the three-year performance period.  Because EPS goals arewere set separately set eachevery year, the amount in the table above based on the EPS performance reflects only the 20152018 portion of the award. Theaward, based on an assumed probably outcome of target performance.  Had the grant date fair value for this portion related to 2016 and 2017 EPS goals will be treated as separate grants in those years. Forof PSUs been based on assumed maximum level of performance (i.e., at 150% of target), the grant date fair value for that portion of the PSUs earned based on 2015 EPS performance,would have been as follows: $182,389 for Mr. Stanik, $49,315 for Mr. McAuley, and $44,494 for Ms. Hoover. For the ROIC portion of the PSUs, the grant date fair value was calculated based on an assumed probable outcome of target performance.  Had the grant date fair value for this portion of the PSUs been based on assumed maximum level of performance (i.e., at 150%200% of target), the grant date fair values fortfor that portion of the PSUs in the table would have been as follows: $54,989the following: $205,700 for Mr. Stanik; $19,971McBrayer; $142,800 for Mr. McAuley; and $187,000 for Ms. Johnson; $31,857 for Ms. Hoover, $40,110 for Mr. Carothers; and $27,495 for Mr. Kenny.Hoover.  For the relative TSR portion of the PSUs, the grant date fair value was calculated using the Monte Carlo methodology. The assumptions made in calculating the grant date fair values are set forth in Note 915 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. For additional information on the PSUs, see “Long-Term Incentive Awards” discussion under the CD&A.Compensation Overview.  

 

For Mr. Stanik, the value of the stock award reflects the value of 4,697 RSUs granted to Mr. Stanik on May 5, 2016, the vesting of which was accelerated pursuant to the Retirement and Consulting Agreement between the Corporation and Mr. Stanik. The amount is based on the June 29, 2018 price of the Corporation’s common stock of $10.25.

(2)The values set forth in this column are based on the aggregate grant date fair value of stock option awards granted to the individual during the applicable fiscal year computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made in calculating the grant date fair values are set forth in Note 9 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

(3)The change in value for 2015 is primarily attributable to an increase in the discount rate from 4.10% to 4.4%. Changes in value for all three years are also influenced by annual changes in executive compensation and adjustments to mortality tables.

(2)

(4)

Represents company contributions to the 401(k) Plan, club memberships, personal use of a company provided vehicleprovided-vehicle, reimbursement for tax preparation and club memberships. Nonefinancial consulting services, or tax gross-ups. Mr. McBrayer received a reimbursement of the individual perquisite values exceededexpenses incurred in connection with his relocation to Pittsburgh, PA, in the thresholdamount of $187,345, and a related tax gross-up in the greateramount of $25,000 or 10% of$51,960.  In accordance with the total perquisites.

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE

       

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards

  

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)

  All
Other

Stock
Awards:

Number
of

Shares
of Stock
or
Units
(#)(5)
  Grant
Date
Fair
Value of
Stock
Awards

($)(6)
 
  Award Grant
Date
  Threshold(2)
($)
  Target(3)
($)
  Maximum(4)
($)
  Threshold(2)
(#)
  Target(3)
(#)
  Maximum(4)
(#)
   
  (a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)  (i)  (l) 

John S. Stanik

 Annual
Incentive
  5/5/15    119,158    238,315    476,630       
 PSUs  5/5/15       5,643    7,524    11,286     119,160  
 RSUs  5/5/15          5,248    82,499  

Marliss D. Johnson

 Annual
Incentive
  5/5/15    37,467    74,934    149,868       
 PSUs  5/5/15       2,050    2,733    4,100     43,283  
 RSUs  5/5/15          1,907    29,978  

Rose Hoover

 Annual
Incentive
  5/5/15    71,680    143,359    286,718       
 PSUs  5/5/15       3,269    4,358    6,537     69,019  
 RSUs  5/5/15          3,040    47,789  

Robert G. Carothers

 Annual
Incentive
  5/5/15    92,301    184,603    369,205       
 PSUs  5/5/15       4,117    5,489    8,234     86,931  
 RSUs  5/5/15          3,829    60,192  

Terrence W. Kenny

 Annual
Incentive
  5/5/15    53,458    106,915    213,830       
 PSUs  5/5/15       2,821    3,761    5,642     59,565  
 RSUs  5/5/15          2,623    41,234  

(1)The amounts shown in this column reflect the number of performance units that would be earned (subject to vesting) ifRetirement and Consulting Agreement between Mr. Stanik and the Corporation, had met the threshold, targetMr. Stanik is entitled to, among other things, COBRA premium and maximum levels of both 2015 earnings per share (“EPS”) and relative TSR performance criteria. Because goals were not setMedicare supplement reimbursement payments (see “Potential Payments upon Termination, Resignation or Change in 2015 for the 2016 and 2017 EPS portion if the PSU awards, those portions were not considered granted in 2015. For 2015, the Corporation did not achieve the threshold level of its EPS goal for year one. See “Long-Term Incentive Award” discussion under the CD&A for additional details.

(2)The “Threshold” amount in the above table represents the amount which could be earned under the 2015 incentive plan, assuming achievement of the minimum level of performance.

(3)The “Target” is the amount payable if income from operations for the Corporation’s segments in their 2015 business plan were attained.

(4)The “Maximum” amount in the above table represents the maximum capped amount which could be earned under the 2015 incentive plans, assuming achievement of the maximum level of performance.

(5)Amounts in this column reflect time-vesting RSUs which vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the May 5, 2015 grant date.

(6)

Amounts in this column reflect the dollar amount of the aggregate grant date fair value of the PSUs and time-vesting RSUs granted during 2015, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ASCControl”).     

Topic 718. The assumptions made in calculating the grant date fair values are set forth in Note 9 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. See footnote (1) to the Summary Compensation Table for additional details.

 


OUTSTANDING EQUITYEQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table summarizes certain information regarding outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end:

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

(a) Option Awards Stock Awards 

(b)

 

 

(c)

 

(e)

 

(f)

 

(g)

 

 

(h)

 

 

(i)

 

 

(j)

 

(a) (b) (c) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) 

Name

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable(1)
 Option
Exercise
Price($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
shares or
units of
stock that
have not
vested(#)(2)
 Market value
of shares or
units of stock
that have not
vested(#)(2)
 Equity incentive
plan awards:
number of
unearned
shares, units or
other rights that
have not
vested(#)(3)
 Equity incentive
plan awards:
market or payout
value of
unearned shares,
units or other
rights that have
not vested($)(3)
 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Exercisable

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Unexercisable

 

Option

Exercise

Price($)

 

Option

Expiration

Date

 

Number of

shares or

units of

stock that

have not

vested(#)(1)

 

 

Market value

of shares or

units of stock

that have not

vested(#)(2)

 

 

Equity incentive plan awards: number of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested(#)(3)

 

 

Equity incentive plan awards: market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested($)(4)

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,884

 

 

 

67,840

 

 

 

12,257

 

 

 

37,997

 

John S. Stanik

      5,248    53,845    3,894    39,952  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marliss D. Johnson

  15,000.00    0    37.89/share    9/4/2018    1,907    19,566    1,415    14,518  
  15,000.00    0    13.37/share    2/19/2019      
  15,000.00    0    25.77/share    2/18/2020      
  8,500    0    25.18/share    5/6/2021      
  8,500    0    17.67/share    5/3/2022      
  5,666.67    2,833.33    17.16/share    5/2/2023      
  2,833.33    5,666.67    20.00/share    4/29/2024      

Michael G. McAuley

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,151

 

 

 

34,568

 

 

 

10,109

 

 

 

31,338

 

Rose Hoover

  20,000.00    0    37.89/share    9/4/2018    3,040    31,191    2,255    23,136  

 

13,334

 

 

0

 

13.37/share

 

2/19/2019

 

 

14,757

 

 

 

45,747

 

 

 

13,358

 

 

 

41,410

 

  13,334.00    0    13.37/share    2/19/2019      

 

20,000

 

 

0

 

25.77/share

 

2/18/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  20,000.00    0    25.77/share    2/18/2020      

 

11,500

 

 

0

 

25.18/share

 

5/6/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  11,500.00    0    25.18/share    5/6/2021      

 

11,500

 

 

0

 

17.67/share

 

5/3/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  11,500.00    0    17.67/share    5/3/2022      

 

11,500

 

 

0

 

17.16/share

 

5/2/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  7,666.67    3,833.33    17.16/share    5/2/2023      

 

11,500

 

 

0

 

20.00/share

 

4/29/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  3,833.33    7,666.67    20.00/share    4/29/2024      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert G. Carothers

  25,000.00    0    37.89/share    9/4/2018    3,829    39,286    2,841    29,149  
  25,000.00    0    25.77/share    2/18/2020      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  13,500.00    0    25.18/share    5/6/2021      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  13,500.00    0    17.67/share    5/3/2022      
  9,000.00    4,500.00    17.16/share    5/2/2023      
  4,166.67    8,333.33    20.00/share    4/29/2024      

Terrence W. Kenny

  20,000.00    0    37.89/share    9/4/2018    2,623    26,912    1,946    19,966  
  16,500    0    13.37/share    2/19/2019      
  20,000.00    0    25.77/share    2/18/2020      
  11,500.00    0    25.18/share    5/6/2021      
  11,500.00    0    17.67/share    5/3/2022      
  7,666.67    3,833.33    17.16/share    5/2/2023      
  3,833.33    7,666.67    20.00/share    4/29/2024      

 

(1)

Unexercisable options vest one-third on each

The amounts shown in this column reflect the aggregate number of the first, second and third anniversaries of the option grants for options expiring on 5/6/2021, 5/3/2022, 5/2/2023 and 4/29/2024.

(2)Includes unvested RSUs granted in 2015.on May 5, 2016, May 3, 2017, and May 9, 2018. These unvested RSUs vest in three equal annual installments beginning May 5, 2016. Value is calculated by multiplying2017, May 3, 2018, and May 9, 2019, respectively, as summarized below.

Name

Grant Date

# of Unvested Shares

Vesting Date

Rose Hoover

5/5/2016

1,472

5/5/2019

5/3/2017

1,964

5/3/2019

5/3/2017

1,965

5/3/2020

5/9/2018

3,118

5/9/2019

5/9/2018

3,119

5/9/2020

5/9/2018

3,119

5/9/2021

Michael G. McAuley

5/5/2016

1,091

5/5/2019

5/3/2017

1,457

5/3/2019

5/3/2017

1,458

5/3/2020

5/9/2018

2,381

5/9/2019

5/9/2018

2,382

5/9/2020

5/9/2018

2,382

5/9/2021

J. Brett McBrayer

7/2/2018

6,000

7/2/2019

7/2/2018

6,000

7/2/2020

7/2/2018

3,294

7/2/2019

7/2/2018

3,295

7/2/2020

7/2/2018

3,295

7/2/2021

(2)

The amounts shown in this column represent the market value of these stock awards based on a closing market price of $3.10 per share as of the close of trading on December 31, 2018 (the last trading day of our fiscal year).

(3)

The amounts shown in this column include the relative TSR portion of the PSUs awarded in 2017 and the relative TSR and ROIC portions of the PSUs awarded in 2018 that remain subject to future performance. For purposes of determining the amounts shown in this column, we assumed achievement of threshold performance goals. The actual number may be more or less depending on the company’s performance during the applicable three-year performance period. All PSUs are scheduled to vest as summarized below:


Name

Grant Date

# of Unvested Shares

Vesting Date

Total(#)

Michael G. McAuley

5/3/2017

3,112

5/3/2020

5/9/2018

6,997

5/9/2021

10,109

Rose Hoover

5/3/2017

4,195

5/3/2020

5/9/2018

9,163

5/9/2021

13,358

J. Brett McBrayer

7/2/2018

12,257

7/2/2021

12,257

For PSUs awarded in 2016, the relative TSR performance of the Corporation for the 2016-2018 performance period was below the threshold value so no stock will be issued at vesting date (May 5, 2019) with respect to the 2016 awards.

(4)

The amounts shown in this column represent the value of the TSR portion of the unvested units byPSUs based on the closing market price of our common stock ($10.26)3.10) as of the close of trading on December 31, 2015 (the last trading day of our fiscal year).2018.


(3)Includes the relative TSR portion of the 2015-2017 PSUs that remain subject to future performance. The number of units is based on assumed performance at threshold. Value is calculated by multiplying the number of PSUs shown by the closing market price of our common stock ($10.26) as of the close of trading on December 31, 2015; actual number of PSUs earned will be based upon performance against applicable adjusted EPS and relative TSR goals.


RETIREMENT BENEFITS

The Corporation also maintains a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”) that covers substantially all regular employees who were employed prior to June 30, 2015, the date on which benefit accruals under the Pension Plan were frozen. Due to Mr. Stanik’s retirement in 2018, he is not entitled to coverage under the Pension Plan since he did not meet the early retirement eligibility requirements. Ms. Hoover is entitled to coverage under the Pension Plan. None of the other named executive officers are covered under the Pension Plan since their employment with the Corporation began after June 30, 2015.  

As discussed above, theThe Corporation also maintains a SERP for certain officersof its current and key employees;former executives; that plan provides retirement benefits after completion of ten years of service and attainment of age 55. AllMs. Hoover is the only named executive officers are participantsofficer who is a participant in the SERP except Mr. Carothers and Mr. Stanik. The Corporation also maintains a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan (the “Plan”) that covers substantially all regular employees, including each of the named executive officers. Benefit accruals under the Plan were frozen effective June 30, 2015, but the SERP was not frozen for the participating named executive officers.SERP. The combined retirement benefit at age 65 or older provided by the Pension Plan and the SERP is 50% of the highest consecutive five-year average earnings in the final ten years of service. Earnings for this purpose generally include all cash compensation, including base salary and annual incentive awards, but excludes certain extra compensation such as compensation from the exercise of stock options. Participants are eligible for reduced benefits for early retirement at age 55. A benefit equal to 50% of the benefit otherwise payable at age 65 is paid to the surviving spouse of any participant who has had at least five years of service, commencing on the later of the month following the participant’s death or the month the participant would have reached age 55. In addition, there is an offset for pensions from other companies. Certain provisions, applicable if there is a change of control, are discussed below in the “Potential Payments Upon Change in Control” section.



Mr. Carothers is a Participant in the Union Electric Steel Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan (the “RR Plan”) as discussed above and is also covered by the tax qualified defined benefit Plan that covers the other named executive officers. As noted above, benefit accruals under the Plan were frozen effective June 30, 2015, but the RR Plan was not frozen for Mr. Carothers. The combined retirement benefit at age 65 or older provided by the RR Plan and the qualified plan is primarily 1.5% of final average earnings, as defined in the qualified plan, multiplied by total years and months of credited service. Final average earnings means the monthly average of base earnings in the highest 60 consecutive months out of the last 120 consecutive months of service. Earnings for this purpose are the same as described above. Based on his years of credited service, Mr. Carothers is eligible for an unreduced benefit at early retirement. A benefit equal to 50% of the benefit otherwise payable at age 65 is paid to the surviving spouse of a participant who has had at least five years of service, commencing on the later of the month following the participant’s death or the month the participant would have reached age 55. In addition, there is an offset for pensions from other companies.

The following table summarizes certain information regarding the value of the retirement benefits accrued by our named executive officers under the Plan and the SERP:

Pension Benefits

(a)  (b)  (c)   (d)   (e) 

Name

  Plan
Name
  Number
of years
credited
service (#)
   Present Value
of Accumulated
Benefit(1)(5) ($)
   Payments
During
Last
Fiscal
Year ($)
 

John Stanik

  Plan   1     17,612     0  

Marliss D. Johnson—PFO

  Plan

SERP

   

 

16

16

  

  

   

 

352,630

922,572

  

  

   

 

0

0

  

  

Rose Hoover(2)

  Plan

SERP

   

 

36

36

  

  

   

 

1,882,071

1,156,618

  

  

   

 

0

0

  

  

Robert G. Carothers(3)

  Plan

RR Plan

   

 

43

43

  

  

   

 

2,105,449

1,091,844

  

  

   

 

0

0

  

  

Terrence W. Kenny(4)

  Plan

SERP

   

 

31

31

  

  

   

 

1,543,638

929,997

  

  

   

 

0

0

  

  

(1)Other benefits shown in column (d) can only be received by participants following retirement in the form of monthly pension payments. A change of control could trigger a lump sum payment for benefits under the SERP.

(2)Ms. Hoover is eligible for early retirement as of December 31, 2015. Assuming a December 31, 2015 retirement, the present value of accumulated plan benefits are $1,513,239 for the Plan and $929,961 for the SERP.

(3)Mr. Carothers is eligible for unreduced early retirement as of December 31, 2015 and eligible for the benefits indicated above.

(4)Mr. Kenny is eligible for early retirement as of December 31, 2015. Assuming a December 31, 2015 retirement, the present value of accumulated plan benefits are $1,215,750 for the Plan and $732,447 for the SERP.

(5)The present value of accumulated retirement and SERP benefits was determined by using normal retirement age, RP2014 White Collar Mortality Post Commencement Mortality projected generationally with the Buck Modified 2015 Scale for December 31, 2015 financial disclosures, life annuity form of payment for the retirement plan and 50% joint and survivor for the SERP. The discount rate for the year ending December 31, 2015 was 4.40%. The rate for the prior year was 4.10%.

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATIONTERMINATION, RESIGNATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Executive Severance Plan

As previously mentioned, in 2018, the Corporation adopted the Executive Severance Plan for its key executive officers other than the CEO, to be in effect for a term of two years. Under the terms of the Executive Severance Plan, in the event of a termination by the Corporation without “cause” or by a participant for “good reason,” the participant, upon execution of a general release of liability against the Corporation and subject to compliance with applicable post-termination restrictive covenants and other obligations, will generally be eligible to receive:

 

an amount equal to the sum of his or her then-current annual base salary and the average annual cash incentive bonus paid to the participant for the three fiscal years immediately preceding the termination date; provided that (i) if the participant has been employed for fewer than three years, the average will be based on the applicable number of years (one or two), and (ii) if the termination occurs in the first year of employment, no bonus amount shall be included; and

The Corporation does

payment by the Corporation of the participant’s COBRA premiums, less the amount that the participant would be required to contribute for such healthcare coverage if the participant were an active employee for a period ending upon the earlier of (x) 12 months and (y) the date on which the participant becomes entitled to comparable welfare benefits from another employer subject to the participant’s proper election to continue healthcare coverage under COBRA.

Mr. McBrayer is not have any agreements or programs providing special severance or other benefitsa participant under the Executive Severance Plan.  However, his offer letter provides that, in the event of a termination of anhis employment other than (1) for “cause” or (2) for circumstances covered by the Change in Control Agreement, he will be eligible for severance pay in the amount equal to 18 months of base compensation if the termination occurs within the first 18 months of his start date (July 1, 2018) and 12 months of base compensation if the termination occurs after 18 months of the start date.

Change in Control Agreements and SERP

Each of the named executive officer priorofficers (other than Mr. Stanik, who retired in 2018) is party to a change in control agreement with the Corporation.  Per the terms of change in control agreements, the named executive officer would be entitled to receive (i) three times the sum of annual salary and bonus paid for the prior year, (ii) continuation of employee benefits for two years (three years for Mr. McBrayer), (iii) cash payment in cancellation of outstanding stock options equal to the spread (if any) based on the greater of the stock price at termination and the price received in the change in control and the exercise price, (iv) accelerated vesting of unvested restricted stock units, and (v) the right to purchase the leased car used by the covered individual at the Corporation’s then book value (this feature is only applicable to Ms. Hoover).  

Ms. Hoover is the only executive officer covered by the SERP.  Per the terms of the SERP, in the event a change in control occurs and, within 24 months after the change in control a named executive officer’s employment is terminated by the Corporation without cause or by the executive for good reason, Ms. Hoover’s benefits under the plan would become vested, payable in a lump sum.  

The Corporation does not provide any tax gross-up payments under these agreements related to excise taxes under Internal Revenue Code Section 280G and 4999, or otherwise. Instead, the agreements provide for a cutback in benefits to avoid triggering such excise taxes, unless the named executive officer would receive a greater after-tax amount without such cutback.

A “change in control” occurs for purposes of the change in control agreements and the SERP:

If a person, other than persons currently in control, becomes an owner, directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Corporation’s outstanding voting securities;

If for two consecutive years there ceases to be a majority on the Board of individuals who at the beginning of the period were Board members, other than a new director whose election was approved by a vote of 2/3 of directors then still in office who were directors at beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously approved;


If the shareholders approve a merger or consolidation in which the Corporation’s common stock is converted into shares of another corporation or cash or other property or the Corporation’s common stock is not converted but 40% of the surviving corporation in the merger is owned by shareholders other than those who owned the Corporation’s common stock prior to merger;

If there occurs any transaction which results in the Corporation’s common stock no longer being publicly traded; or

If the shareholders of the Corporation except that Mr. Stanik’s offer letterapprove a plan of complete liquidation or agreement for sale or disposition of substantially all assets followed by distribution of proceeds to shareholders.

A termination for “cause” occurs in each of the following cases:

willful and continued failure to substantially perform duties (other than due to disability) consistent with the named executive officer’s position with the Corporation provides him with(subject to notice and cure provisions);

willful engagement in conduct that is demonstrably and materially injurious to the Corporation; or

the named executive officer’s conviction of a severancefelony, or conviction of a misdemeanor involving assets of the Corporation.

A named executive officer may claim “good reason” for termination in the following events, subject to certain notice requirements and an opportunity for the Corporation to cure:

a reduction in scope of duties and authority or adverse change in reporting relationship;

a reduction in base salary or bonus (unless similar reductions in bonuses are made for all executives);

relocation of the executive by the Corporation greater than 25 miles;

the failure by the Corporation to continue in effect any of the Corporation’s employee benefit equalplans, policies, practices in which the named executive officer participated before the change in control; or

failure to 12 monthscause the change in control agreement to be assumed by the Corporation’s successor.

2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Under the terms of salary in case of termination without cause. Had Mr. Stanik been terminated without cause as of December 31, 2015, this severance benefit would have equaled $550,000.

the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the 2016, 2017 and 2018 RSUs and PSUs granted in 2015 include special vesting provisions in case of termination of employment due to the participant’s death or disability.a change in control. In that case, RSUs become fully vested and PSUs become vested as follows: (A) for the TSR portion,and ROIC portions of the PSUs, a prorated number of the PSUs will become immediately earned and vested as of the date of such termination assuming target performance and based on the portion of the performance period completed through the date of such termination; (B) for any performance-adjusted PSUs related to the EPS portion for any previously completed year in the performance period, such performance-adjusted PSUs will become immediately earned and vested as of the date of such termination; and (C) for the one-third portion of the EPS portion being earned for the year of such termination, a prorated number of such PSUs shall become immediately earned and vested as of the date of such termination assuming target performance and based on the portion of the applicable year completed through the date of such termination; and (D) for any one-third portion oftermination.

Under the EPS portion to be earned for any year beginning after the year of such termination, such PSUs will be immediately canceled as of the date of termination. Had each named executive officer terminated employment with the Corporation as of December 31, 2015 due to death or disability, based on the closing price of the Corporation’s common stock on December 31, 2015 of $10.26, the value of the RSUs and PSUs vesting on that date would have been as follows: Mr. Stanik—$149,375; Ms. Johnson—$34,710; Ms. Hoover—$55,332; Mr. Carothers—$69,696; and Mr. Kenny—$47,750.

Upon the occurrence of a change in control, under the terms of the 20112016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, any outstanding stock options become immediately vested and exercisable. Had a change in control occurred as of December 31, 2015, the options that would have accelerated all had exercise prices greater than the closing price of the Corporations common stock on that date. Therefore those options would have had no value upon such a change in control.

In the event a change in control occurs and, within 24 months after the change in control a named executive officer’s employment is terminated by the Corporation without cause or by the executive for good reason, the named executive officer would be eligible to receive the following payments:

Per the terms of change in control agreements between the Corporation and each named executive officer, the named executive officer would be entitled to receive (i) three times the sum of annual salary and bonus paid for the prior year, (ii) continuation of employee benefits for two years (three years for Mr. Stanik), (iii) cash payment in cancellation of outstanding stock options equal to the spread (if any) based on the greater of the stock price at termination and the price received in the change in control, and (iv) the right to purchase the leased car used by the covered individual at the Corporation’s then book value.

Per the terms of the SERP and the Restoration Plan, assuming the named executive officer has at least five years of service at the date of termination, the named executive officer becomes vested in the benefits under the plan (if not already eligible for early retirement) payable in a lump sum (without reduction for early retirement and based on certain specified assumptions).

Per the terms of the 2015 RSUs and PSUs, vesting accelerates on the same basis as described above for termination due to death or disability.

The Corporation does not provide any tax gross-up payments under these agreements related to excise taxes under Internal Revenue Code Section 280G and 4999, or otherwise. Instead, the agreements provide for a cut back in benefits to avoid triggering such excise taxes, unless the named executive officer would receive a greater after-tax amount without such cutback.

If a named executive officer’s employment was terminated without cause or with good reason on December 31, 2015 within 24 months after a change in control, the estimated payments and benefits that would be payable by the Corporation to the named executive officers would be as summarized in the following table:

Payments Upon Termination Without Cause/With Good Reason After Change in Control

Name

   Severance     
 
Benefits
Continuation
  
  
   
 
SERP or RR
Vesting
  
  
   
 
Equity
Vesting
  
  
   Total*  

John S. Stanik

   1,650,000     55,847     0     149,375     1,855,222  

Marliss D. Johnson

   949,341     44,330     2,476,700     34,710     3,505,081  

Rose Hoover

   1,375,728     44,415     2,044,283     55,332     3,519,758  

Robert G. Carothers

   1,448,484     35,542     382,666     69,696     1,936,388  

Terrence W. Kenny

   1,265,976     34,108     2,503,059     47,750     3,850,893  

*Note: No value is included for the potential option cash out under the change in control agreement because all of the unvested options are currently underwater. The potential purchase of the leased car at book value under the change in control agreement is not considered compensatory for purposes of this table.

Under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, for purposes of vesting of options, RSUs and PSUs, a “change in control” occurs:

If a person, other than persons currently in control, becomes an owner, directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Corporation’s outstanding voting securities;

If any election has occurred of persons to the Board that causes two-thirds of the Board to consist of persons other than (i) persons who were members of the Board on the effective date of the 20112016 Omnibus Incentive Plan and (ii) persons who were nominated for elections as members of the Board at a time when two-thirds of the Board consisted of persons who were members of the Board on that effective date;

Upon consummation (i.e. closing) of a reorganization, merger or consolidation involving the Corporation, unless, following such reorganization, merger or consolidation, the owners of the Corporation before the transaction own more than 75% of the resulting entity;


 

Upon consummation (i.e. closing) of a reorganization, merger or consolidation involving the Corporation, unless, following such reorganization, merger or consolidation, the owners of the Corporation before the transaction own more than 75% of the resulting entity;

Upon consummation (i.e. closing) of a sale of substantially all of the Corporation’s assets, unless the owners of the Corporation before the transaction own more than 75% of the purchaser; or

If there is a complete liquidation or dissolution of the CorporationCorporation.

Retirement and Consulting Agreement

A “change in control” occurs for purposesMr. Stanik retired as the CEO of the changeCorporation effective as of June 30, 2018.  Pursuant to the Retirement and Consulting Agreement between the Corporation and Mr. Stanik, dated as of June 30, 2018, in control agreements,exchange for Mr. Stanik executing a general release of claims against the SERPCorporation, Mr. Stanik has received or is entitled to receive, as applicable, the following compensation: (i) accelerated vesting of 4,697 RSUs granted to Mr. Stanik on May 5, 2016, (ii) reimbursement of (A) COBRA premiums for Mr. Stanik through October 2018 and for his spouse through December 31, 2019, and (B) Medicare supplement for Mr. Stanik through December 31, 2019, and (iii) payment of a pro rata portion of Mr. Stanik’s short-term incentive award for the Restoration Plan:

If a person, other than persons currently2018 fiscal year, in control, becomes an owner, directly or indirectly,the amount of 50% or more$72,587, which is to be paid in shares of common stock of the combined voting power of the Corporation’s outstanding voting securities;

If for two consecutive years there ceases to be a majorityCorporation, rather than cash, based on the Boardclosing price of individuals who at the beginning of the period were Board members, other than a new director whose election was approved by a vote of 2/3 of directors then still in office who were directors at beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously approved;

If the shareholders approve a merger or consolidation in which the Corporation’s common stock is converted into shares of another corporation or cash or other property or the Corporation’s common stock is not converted but 40% of the surviving corporation in the merger is owned by shareholders other than those who owned the Corporation’s common stock prior to merger;

If there occurs any transaction which results in the Corporation’s common stock no longer being publicly traded; or

If the shareholders of the Corporation approve a plan of complete liquidation or agreement for sale or disposition of substantially all assets followed by distribution of proceeds to shareholders.

A termination is for “cause” occurs in each of the following cases:

willful and continued failure to substantially perform duties (other than due to disability) consistent with the named executive officer’s position with the Corporation (subject to notice and cure provisions);

willful engagement in conduct that is demonstrably and materially injurious to the Corporation; or

the named executive officer’s conviction of a felony, or conviction of a misdemeanor involving assets of the Corporation.

A named executive officer may claim “good reason” for termination in the following events, subject to certain notice requirements and an opportunity for the Corporation to cure:

a reduction in scope of duties and authority or adverse change in reporting relationship;

a reduction in base salary or bonus (with certain exceptions);

relocation greater than 25 miles;

the failure by the Corporation to continue in effect any of the Corporation’s employee benefit plans, policies, practices in which the named executive officer participated before the change in control; or

failure to cause the change in control agreement to be assumed by the Corporation’s successor.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORTon March 15, 2019.  

 

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and based on the review and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Corporation’s annual report on Form 10-K and, as applicable, the Corporation’s proxy or information statement.

William K. Lieberman, Chairman

Paul A. Gould

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

In 2015, the Compensation Committee was comprised of Paul A. Gould, William K. Lieberman (Chairman) and Carl H. Pforzheimer, III. None of those individuals has ever been an officer or employee of the Corporation.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The Corporation’s policies and procedures for reviewing, approving and ratifying transactions with related persons are set forth in the Corporation’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com. Under these policies and procedures, the Corporation’s management is responsible for determining whether a particular transaction should be referred to the Nominating and Governance Committee for consideration. The Nominating and Governance Committee then determines

whether to approve, ratify, revise the terms of, reject the transaction or refer the transaction to the full Board or another appropriate committee of the Board for approval or ratification. The policy and procedures apply to transactions involving an amount in excess of $120,000 in which a related person has a direct or indirect material interest. The policy and procedures generally do not apply to employment matters (except employment of an executive officer who is an immediate family member of another executive officer), director compensation, commercial transactions in the ordinary course of business under ordinary business terms, charitable contributions, transactions such as payment of dividends where all shareholders receive the same proportional benefits and transactions involving competitive bids.

In 2015, the Corporation bought industrial supplies from a subsidiary of The Louis Berkman Company in transactions in the ordinary course of business amounting to approximately $1,270,000. Additionally, The Louis Berkman Company paid the Corporation $72,000 for certain administrative services. Larry E. Paul and Stephen E. Paul are directors of that company. These transactions and services were at prices generally available from outside sources. It is expected that transactions between the parties will also take place in 2016.

The purchase of industrial supplies from a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Louis Berkman Investment Company follows a competitive bid process which includes several non-related vendors after which annual contract awards are made to the lowest bidder by the purchasing executive at each of the Corporation’s subsidiary companies. The administration services are provided under an agreement to provide such services for fees which are subject to annual review including an increase to cover inflation in the costs of the Corporation.

Pursuant to the Retirement and Consulting Agreement, effective January 1, 2015 and amended effective as of March 2, 2016, between the Corporation and Mr. Robert Paul, the Corporation’s former CEO, the Corporation paid Mr. Paul $400,000 in 2015 for the consulting services requested from time to time by the Board or the CEO.

J. Fredrik Strömholm is a partner of Altor Equity Partners AB (“Altor Partners”). Altor Partners is the investment advisor to Altor Fund II GP Limited (“Altor”), which owns Åkers Holding AB (“Åkers”). Mr. Strömholm is also an owner of and indirect investor in Altor. On March 3, 2016 the Corporation completed its acquisition of all of the outstanding stock of Åkers AB and certain of its affiliated companies (collectively, the “Acquired Companies”) from Åkers. The Corporation acquired the Acquired Companies in exchange for aggregate consideration of approximately $75,000,000, consisting of: (i) $30,000,000 in cash; (ii) 1,776,604 shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock; and (iii) two subordinated promissory notes in the aggregate initial principal balance of approximately $25,000,000.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and discussed those matters required to be discussed under Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) standards with Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”).

The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Deloitte’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte its independence.

Based on the review and discussions referred to in the preceding paragraphs, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the last fiscal year for filing with the SEC.

The following table summarizes the aggregate fees billed to the Corporation by Deloitte:

 

  2015   2014 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Audit fees (a)

  $870,026    $791,453  

 

$

1,656,185

 

 

$

1,343,263

 

Audit-related fees (b)

   835,092     17,991  

 

$

2,028

 

 

$

2,695

 

Tax fees

   —       —    

Tax fees (c)

 

$

1,964

 

 

$

177,642

 

All other fees

   —       —    

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total (c)

  $1,705,118    $809,444  
  

 

   

 

 

Total

 

$

1,660,177

 

 

$

1,523,600

 


 

(a)

Fees for audit services primarily related primarily to the audit of (1) the Corporation’s annual consolidated financial statements and its internal control over financial reporting.reporting and (2) statutory filings for the Corporation’s foreign subsidiaries.

(b)

Fees for audit-related services in 2015 primarily represent due diligence services related to potential acquisitions whereas 2014 related primarily to the audits of the Corporation’s employee benefit planssubscription fee for Deloitte’s research guidance.

(c)

The Audit Committee approved all

Fees for tax services in 2018 related to general tax consultation whereas fees in the years reported.2017 were primarily related to tax advice provided in tax restructuring transactions and transfer pricing studies.

In considering the nature of the services provided by Deloitte, the Audit Committee determined that such services are compatible with the provision of independent audit services. The Audit Committee discussed these services with Deloitte and the Corporation’s management to determine that they are permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence promulgated by the SEC. All services provided by Deloitte and reflected in the table above were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the policy described below.

The Audit Committee has adopted a Policy for Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services (the “Policy”) provided by the Corporation’s independent auditor. According to the Policy, the Corporation’s independent auditor may not provide the following services to the Corporation:

maintain or prepare the Corporation’s accounting records or prepare the Corporation’s financial statements that are either filed with the SEC or form the basis of financial statements filed with the SEC;

provide appraisal or valuation services when it is reasonably likely that the results of any valuation or appraisal would be material to the Corporation’s financial statements or where the independent auditor would audit the results;

provide certain management or human resource functions;

serve as a broker-dealer, promoter or underwriter of the Corporation’s securities;

provide any service in which the person providing the service must be admitted to practice before the courts of a U.S. jurisdiction;

provide any internal audit services relating to accounting controls, financial systems, or financial statements; or

design or implement a hardware or software system that aggregates source data underlying the financial statements or generates information that is significant to the Corporation’s financial statements, taken as a whole.

In addition, in connection with its adoption of the Policy, the Audit Committee pre-approved certain audit-related and other non-prohibited services. Any services not prohibited or pre-approved by the Policy must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the Policy. The Policy is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Directors.

 

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III (Chairman)

Leonard M. Carroll

Michael I. German

Paul A. Gould

William K. Lieberman

Approval of the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan

(Proposal 3)

Background

On March 2, 2016, the Board of Directors approved, subject to stockholder approval, the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”). If the 2016 Plan is approved by our stockholders, it will authorize the issuance of a number of shares of Company common stock equal to 1,100,000 shares. The 2016 Plan will replace the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Predecessor Plan”), and no new awards will be granted under the Predecessor Plan. Any awards outstanding under the Predecessor Plan on the date of stockholder approval of the 2016 Plan will remain subject to and be paid under the Predecessor Plan, and any shares subject to outstanding awards under the Predecessor Plan that subsequently cease to be subject to such awards (other than by reason of settlement of the awards in shares) will automatically become available for issuance under the 2016 Plan.

The Board believes that the number of shares requested for the 2016 Plan is reasonable. Based on our estimated future run rate consistent with current grant practices (and depending on assumptions about future stock price), we estimate that the shares requested under the 2016 Plan should last three to four years. We have reviewed our current grant practices and run rate with Pay Governance and believe that our run rate is within competitive norms.

The Board of Directors recommends that stockholders approve the 2016 Plan. The purpose of the 2016 Plan is to enhance the Company’s ability to attract and retain highly qualified officers, non-employee directors, key employees, consultants and advisors, and to motivate such service providers to serve the Company and to expend maximum effort to improve the business results and earnings of the Company, by providing to such persons an opportunity to acquire or increase a direct proprietary interest in the operations and future success of the Company. The 2016 Plan also allows the Company to promote greater ownership in the Company by such service providers in order to align their interests more closely with the interests of the Company’s stockholders. Stockholder approval of the 2016 Plan will also enable the Company to grant awards under the 2016 Plan that are designed to qualify for special tax treatment under Section 422 of the Code, and to enable the Company to design both cash-based and equity-based awards intended to be fully deductible as “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m).

Under Code Section 162(m), we are generally prohibited from deducting compensation paid to “covered employees” in excess of $1 million per person in any year. “Covered employees” are defined as the chief executive officer and the three other most highly compensated named executive officers (excluding the chief financial officer). Compensation that qualifies as “performance-based” is not subject to the $1 million limit. In general, one of the requirements that must be satisfied to qualify as “performance-based” compensation is that the material terms of the performance goals under which the compensation may be paid must be disclosed to and approved by a majority vote of our stockholders, generally at least once every five years. For purposes of Code Section 162(m), the material terms of the performance goals generally include (a) the individuals eligible to receive compensation upon achievement of performance goals, (b) a description of the business criteria on which the performance goals may be based, and (c) the maximum amount that can be paid to an individual upon attainment of the performance goals. By approving the 2016 Plan, stockholders also will be approving the material terms of the performance goals under the 2016 Plan. The material terms of the performance goals for the 2016 Plan are disclosed below under “Summary of the 2016 Plan.” Although stockholder approval of the 2016 Plan will provide flexibility to grant awards under the 2016 Plan that qualify as “performance-based” compensation under Code Section 162(m), we retain the ability to grant awards under the 2016 Plan that do not qualify as “performance-based” compensation under Code Section 162(m).

Key Features

The following features of the 2016 Plan will continue to protect the interests of our stockholders:

No liberal share counting. The 2016 Plan prohibits the Company from re-using shares that are tendered or surrendered to pay the exercise cost or tax obligation of grants (such a practice is an example of a “liberal share counting” provision that is disfavored by many institutional investors). The only shares that are re-used in the 2016 Plan are for awards that have been canceled, forfeited, expired or for awards settled in cash.Carl H. Pforzheimer, III (Chairman)

Michael I. German

William K. Lieberman

Ernest G. Siddons

Limitation on terms of stock options and stock appreciation rights. The maximum term of each stock option and stock appreciation right, or SARs, is ten years.

No repricing or grant of discounted stock options. The 2016 Plan does not permit the repricing of options or stock appreciation rights either by amending an existing award or by substituting a new award at a lower price. The 2016 Plan prohibits the granting of stock options or stock appreciation rights with an exercise price less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant.

Minimum vesting requirements. The 2016 Plan includes a 12-month minimum vesting period for stock options, SARs, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards.

Clawback. Awards granted under the 2016 Plan are subject to any then current compensation recovery or clawback policy of the Company that applies to awards under the 2016 Plan.

Double-trigger acceleration. Under the 2016 Plan, we do not accelerate vesting of awards that are assumed or replaced by the resulting entity after a change in control unless an employee’s employment is also terminated by the Company without cause or by the employee with good reason within two years of the change in control.

Code Section 162(m) Eligibility. Provides flexibility to grant awards under the 2016 Plan that qualify as “performance-based” compensation under Code Section 162(m).

Dividends. We do not pay dividends or dividend equivalents on stock options, stock appreciation rights or unearned performance shares.

Summary of the 2016 Plan

The principal features of the 2016 Plan are summarized below. The following summary of the 2016 Plan does not purport to be a complete description of all of the provisions of the 2016 Plan. It is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the 2016 Plan, which is attached to this proxy statement as Annex I.

Eligibility

Awards may be granted under the 2016 Plan to officers, employees, consultants and advisors of the Company and its affiliates and to non-employee directors of the Company. Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees of the Company or its subsidiaries. As of March 11, 2016, approximately 100 individuals were eligible to receive awards under the 2016 Plan, including six executive officers and ten non-employee directors.

Administration

The 2016 Plan may be administered by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee, in its discretion, selects the individuals to whom awards may be granted, the time or times at which such awards are granted, and the terms of such awards.

Number of Authorized Shares

The number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the 2016 Plan is 1,100,000 shares. In addition, as of the date of stockholder approval of the 2016 Plan, any awards then outstanding under the

Predecessor Plan will remain subject to and be paid under the Predecessor Plan and any shares then subject to outstanding awards under the Predecessor Plan that subsequently expire, terminate, or are surrendered or forfeited for any reason without issuance of shares will automatically become available for issuance under the 2016 Plan. Up to 1,100,000 shares may be granted as incentive stock options under Code Section 422. The shares of common stock issuable under the 2016 Plan will consist of authorized and unissued shares, treasury shares, or shares purchased on the open market or otherwise.

If any award is canceled, terminates, expires or lapses for any reason prior to the issuance of shares or if shares are issued under the 2016 Plan and thereafter are forfeited to the Company, the shares subject to such awards and the forfeited shares will not count against the aggregate number of shares of common stock available for grant under the 2016 Plan. In addition, the following items will not count against the aggregate number of shares of common stock available for grant under the 2016 Plan: (a) the payment in cash of dividends or dividend equivalents under any outstanding award, (b) any award that is settled in cash rather than by issuance of shares of common stock, or (c) awards granted in assumption of or in substitution for awards previously granted by an acquired company. Shares tendered or withheld to pay the option exercise price or tax withholding will continue to count against the aggregate number of shares of common stock available for grant under the 2016 Plan. Any shares repurchased by the Corporation with cash proceeds from the exercise of options will not be added back to the pool of shares available for grant under the 2016 Plan.

Awards to Non-employee Directors

No more than $200,000 may be granted in equity-based awards during any one year to a non-employee member of the Board of Directors, based on the grant date fair value for accounting purposes in the case of stock options or stock appreciation rights and based on the fair market value of the common stock underlying the award on the grant date for other equity-based awards. This limit does not apply to shares received by a non-employee director at his or her election in lieu of all or a portion of the director’s retainer for board service (described below).

Adjustments

If certain changes in the common stock occur by reason of any recapitalization, reclassification, stock split, reverse split, combination of shares, exchange of shares, stock dividend or other distribution payable in stock, or other increase or decrease in the common stock without receipt of consideration by the Company, or if there occurs any spin-off, split-up, extraordinary cash dividend or other distribution of assets by the Company, the number and kind of securities for which stock options and other stock-based awards may be made under the 2016 Plan, including the individual award limits for “performance-based” compensation under Code Section 162(m), shall be equitably adjusted by the Company. In addition, if there occurs any spin-off, split-up, extraordinary cash dividend or other distribution of assets by the Company, the number and kind of securities subject to any outstanding awards and the exercise price of any outstanding stock options or SARs shall be equitably adjusted by the Company.

Types of Awards

The 2016 Plan permits the granting of any or all of the following types of awards:

Stock Options. Stock options entitle the holder to purchase a specified number of shares of common stock at a specified price (the exercise price), subject to the terms and conditions of the stock option grant. The Compensation Committee may grant either incentive stock options, which must comply with Code Section 422, or nonqualified stock options. The Compensation Committee sets exercise prices and terms, except that stock options must be granted with an exercise price not less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant and with a minimum 12-month vesting period (excluding stock options granted in connection with assuming or substituting stock options in

acquisition transactions). Unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, fair market value means, as of a given date, the closing price of the common stock. At the time of grant, the Compensation Committee determines the terms and conditions of stock options, including the quantity, exercise price, vesting periods, term (which cannot exceed ten years) and other conditions on exercise.

Stock Appreciation Rights. The Compensation Committee may grant SARs, as a right in tandem with the number of shares underlying stock options granted under the 2016 Plan or as a freestanding award. Upon exercise, SARs entitle the holder to receive payment per share in stock or cash, or in a combination of stock and cash, equal to the excess of the share’s fair market value on the date of exercise over the grant price of the SAR. The grant price of a tandem SAR is equal to the exercise price of the related stock option and the grant price for a freestanding SAR is determined by the Compensation Committee in accordance with the procedures described above for stock options. Exercise of a SAR issued in tandem with a stock option will reduce the number of shares underlying the related stock option to the extent of the SAR exercised. The term of a freestanding SAR cannot exceed ten years with a minimum 12-month vesting period, and the term of a tandem SAR cannot exceed the term of the related stock option.

Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units and Other Stock-Based Awards. The Compensation Committee may grant awards of restricted stock, which are shares of common stock subject to specified restrictions, and restricted stock units, which represent the right to receive shares of the common stock in the future. These awards may be made subject to repurchase, forfeiture or vesting restrictions at the Compensation Committee’s discretion. The restrictions may be based on continuous service with the Company or the attainment of specified performance goals, as determined by the Compensation Committee, with a minimum 12-month vesting period. Stock units may be paid in stock or cash or a combination of stock and cash, as determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may also grant other types of equity or equity-based awards subject to the terms of the 2016 Plan and any other terms and conditions determined by the Compensation Committee.

Performance Awards. The Compensation Committee may grant performance awards, which entitle participants to receive a payment from the Company, the amount of which is based on the attainment of performance goals established by the Compensation Committee over a specified award period. Performance awards may be denominated in shares of common stock or in cash, and may be paid in stock or cash or a combination of stock and cash, as determined by the Compensation Committee. Cash-based performance awards include annual incentive awards.

No Repricing

Without stockholder approval, the Compensation Committee is not authorized to (a) lower the exercise or grant price of a stock option or SAR after it is granted, except in connection with certain adjustments to our corporate or capital structure permitted by the 2016 Plan, such as stock splits, (b) take any other action that is treated as a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles or (c) cancel a stock option or SAR at a time when its exercise or grant price exceeds the fair market value of the underlying stock, in exchange for cash, another stock option or SAR, restricted stock, restricted stock units or other equity award, unless the cancellation and exchange occur in connection with a change in capitalization or other similar change.

Clawback

All cash and equity awards granted under the 2016 Plan will be subject to the requirements of Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act regarding the recovery of erroneously awarded compensation, any implementing rules and regulations under such act, any policies adopted by the Company to implement such requirements, and any other compensation recovery policies as may be adopted from time to time by the Company.

Performance-Based Compensation under Section 162(m)

Performance Goals and Criteria. Under Code Section 162(m), we generally are prohibited from deducting compensation paid to our principal executive officer and our three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than our principal financial officer) in excess of $1 million per person in any year. However, compensation that qualifies as “performance-based” is not subject to the $1 million limit.

If the Compensation Committee intends to qualify an award under the 2016 Plan as “performance-based” compensation under Code Section 162(m), the performance goals selected by the Compensation Committee may be based on the attainment of specified levels of one, or any combination, of the following performance criteria: (i) cash flow; (ii) earnings per share; (iii) earnings or income measures (including EBITDA)); (iv) return measures (including return on assets, capital, invested capital, equity, sales, or revenue); (v) total shareholder return; (vi) share price performance; (vii) revenue; (viii) profit margin; (ix) customer metrics (including customer satisfaction, customer retention, customer profitability, or customer contract terms); (x) productivity; (xi) expense targets; (xii) market share; (xiii) cost control measures; (xiv) balance sheet metrics; (xv) strategic initiatives; (xvi) implementation, completion or attainment of measurable objectives with respect to recruitment or retention of personnel or employee satisfaction; (xvi) successful completion of, or achievement of milestones or objectives related to, financing or capital raising transactions, strategic acquisitions or divestitures, joint ventures, partnerships, collaborations, or other transactions; (xvii) debt levels or reduction or debt ratios; (xviii) operating efficiency; (xix) working capital targets; (xx) quantifiable, objective measures of individual performance relevant to the particular individual’s job responsibilities or (xxi) any combination of the forgoing business criteria. The Compensation Committee can also select any derivations of these business criteria (e.g., income shall include pre-tax income, net income, or operating income).

Performance goals may, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, be established on a Company- wide basis, or with respect to one or more business units, divisions, subsidiaries or business segments, as applicable. Performance goals may be absolute or relative to the performance of one or more comparable companies or indices or based on year-over-year growth.

The Compensation Committee may determine at the time that the performance goals are established the extent to which measurement of performance goals may exclude the impact of charges for restructuring, discontinued operations, debt redemption or retirement, asset write downs, litigation or claim judgments or settlements, acquisitions or divestitures, foreign exchange gains and losses, and other unusual non-recurring items, and the cumulative effects of tax or accounting changes.

In addition, compensation realized from the exercise of options and SARs granted under the 2016 Plan is intended to meet the requirements of the performance-based compensation exception under Code Section 162(m). These awards must have an exercise price equal at least to fair market value at the date of grant, are granted to covered individuals by a Compensation Committee consisting of at least two outside directors, and the 2016 Plan limits the number of shares that may be the subject of awards granted to any individual during any calendar year.

Limitations. Subject to certain adjustments for changes in our corporate or capital structure described above, participants who are granted awards intended to qualify as “performance-based” compensation under Code Section 162(m) may not be granted stock options or stock appreciation rights for more than 100,000 shares in any calendar year or more than 100,000 shares for all share-based awards that are performance awards in any calendar year. The maximum dollar value granted to any participant pursuant to that portion of a cash award granted under the 2016 Plan for any calendar year to any employee that is intended to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m) may not exceed $1 million for an annual incentive award and $1 million for all other cash-based awards.

Transferability

Awards are not transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, except that in certain instances transfers may be made to or for the benefit of designated family members of the participant for no value.

Change in Control

Under the 2016 Plan, in the event of a change in control, outstanding awards will be treated in accordance with the applicable transaction agreement. If no treatment is provided for in the transaction agreement, each award holder will be entitled to receive the same consideration that shareholders receive in the change in control for each share of stock subject to the award holder’s awards, upon the exercise, payment or transfer of the awards, but the awards will remain subject to the same terms, conditions, and performance criteria applicable to the awards before the change in control, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee. In connection with a change in control, outstanding stock options and SARs can be cancelled in exchange for the excess of the per share consideration paid to stockholders in the transaction, minus the option or SARs exercise price.

Subject to the terms of the applicable award agreements, vesting of awards will depend on whether the awards are assumed, converted or replaced by the resulting entity.

For awards that are not assumed, converted or replaced, the awards will vest upon the change in control. For performance awards, the amount vesting will be based on the greater of (1) achievement of all performance goals at the “target” level or (2) the actual level of achievement of performance goals as of the Company’s fiscal quarter end preceding the change in control, and will be prorated based on the portion of the performance period that had been completed through the date of the change in control.

 

For awards that are assumed, converted or replaced by the resulting entity, no automatic vesting will occur upon the change in control. Instead, the awards, as adjusted in connection with the transaction, will continue to vest in accordance with their terms. In addition, the awards will vest if the award recipient has a separation from service within two years after the change in control by the Company other than for cause (which may include a separation from service by the award recipient for good reason if provided in the applicable award agreement). For performance awards, the amount vesting will be based on the greater of (1) achievement of all performance goals at the “target” level or (2) the actual level of achievement of performance goals as of the Company’s fiscal quarter end preceding the change in control, and will be prorated based on the portion of the performance period that had been completed through the date of the separation from service.


 

“Change in control” is defined under the 2016 Plan and requires consummation of the applicable transaction.

Term, Termination and Amendment of the 2016 Plan

Unless earlier terminated by the Board of Directors, the 2016 Plan will terminate, and no further awards may be granted, ten years after the date on which it is approved by stockholders. The Board may amend, suspend or terminate the 2016 Plan at any time, except that, if required by applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rule, stockholder approval will be required for any amendment. The amendment, suspension or termination of the 2016 Plan or the amendment of an outstanding award generally may not, without a participant’s consent, materially impair the participant’s rights under an outstanding award.

New Plan Benefits

A new plan benefits table for the 2016 Plan and the benefits or amounts that would have been received by or allocated to participants for the last completed fiscal year under the 2016 Plan if the 2016 Plan was then in effect, as described in the federal proxy rules, are not provided because all awards made under the 2016 Plan will be made at the Compensation Committee’s discretion, subject to the terms of the 2016 Plan. Therefore, the benefits and amounts that will be received or allocated under the 2016 Plan are not determinable at this time. The equity grant program for our non-employee directors is described under the Director Compensation section in this Proxy Statement.

Equity Compensation Plan Table

The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2015, with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Corporation are authorized for issuance:

  (a)  (b)  (c) 

Plan Category

 Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,

warrants and rights(1)
  Weighted-average exercise
price of  outstanding options,
warrants and rights(2)
  Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under  equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))(3)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  1,159,198   $24.03    64,612  

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

  N/A    N/A    N/A  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  1,159,198   $24.03    64,612  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Includes 145,862 unvested restricted stock units, including performance share units (assuming maximum performance).

(2)Does not reflect restricted stock units included in the first column, which do not have an exercise price.

(3)As noted above, no new awards will be granted under the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan if the 2016 Plan becomes effective upon shareholder approval.

Federal Income Tax Information

The following is a brief summary of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the 2016 Plan generally applicable to the Company and to participants in the 2016 Plan who are subject to U.S. federal taxes. The summary is based on the Code, applicable Treasury Regulations and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, each as in effect on the date of this Proxy Statement, and is, therefore, subject to future changes in the law, possibly with retroactive effect. The summary is general in nature and does not purport to be legal or tax advice. Furthermore, the summary does not address issues relating to any U.S. gift or estate tax consequences or the consequences of any state, local or foreign tax laws.

Nonqualified Stock Options. A participant generally will not recognize taxable income upon the grant or vesting of a nonqualified stock option with an exercise price at least equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and no additional deferral feature. Upon the exercise of a nonqualified stock option, a participant generally will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares underlying the stock option on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the stock option. When a participant sells the shares, the participant will have short-term or long-term capital gain or loss, as the case may be, equal to the difference between the amount the participant received from the sale and the tax basis of the shares sold. The tax basis of the shares generally will be equal to the greater of the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date or the exercise price of the stock option.

Incentive Stock Options. A participant generally will not recognize taxable income upon the grant of an incentive stock option. If a participant exercises an incentive stock option during employment or within three months after employment ends (12 months in the case of permanent and total disability), the participant will not recognize taxable income at the time of exercise for regular U.S. federal income tax purposes (although the participant generally will have taxable income for alternative minimum tax purposes at that time as if the stock option were a nonqualified stock option). If a participant sells or otherwise disposes of the shares acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option after the later of (a) one year from the date the participant exercised the option and (b) two years from the grant date of the stock option, the participant generally will recognize long-

term capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount the participant received in the disposition and the exercise price of the stock option. If a participant sells or otherwise disposes of shares acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option before these holding period requirements are satisfied, the disposition will constitute a “disqualifying disposition,” and the participant generally will recognize taxable ordinary income in the year of disposition equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price of the stock option (or, if less, the excess of the amount realized on the disposition of the shares over the exercise price of the stock option). The balance of the participant’s gain on a disqualifying disposition, if any, will be taxed as short-term or long-term capital gain, as the case may be.

With respect to both nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options, special rules apply if a participant uses shares of common stock already held by the participant to pay the exercise price or if the shares received upon exercise of the stock option are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture by the participant.

Stock Appreciation Rights. A participant generally will not recognize taxable income upon the grant or vesting of a SAR with a grant price at least equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and no additional deferral feature. Upon the exercise of a SAR, a participant generally will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares underlying the SAR on the date of exercise and the grant price of the SAR.

Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Units, and Performance Awards. A participant generally will not have taxable income upon the grant of restricted stock, restricted stock units or performance awards. Instead, the participant will recognize ordinary income at the time of vesting or payout equal to the fair market value (on the vesting or payout date) of the shares or cash received minus any amount paid. For restricted stock only, a participant may instead elect to be taxed at the time of grant.

Other Stock or Cash-Based Awards. The U.S. federal income tax consequences of other stock or cash- based awards will depend upon the specific terms of each award.

Tax Consequences to the Company. In the foregoing cases, we generally will be entitled to a deduction at the same time, and in the same amount, as a participant recognizes ordinary income, subject to certain limitations imposed under the Code.

Code Section 409A. We intend that awards granted under the 2016 Plan comply with, or otherwise be exempt from, Code Section 409A, but make no representation or warranty to that effect.

Tax Withholding. We are authorized to deduct or withhold from any award granted or payment due under the 2016 Plan, or require a participant to remit to us, the amount of any withholding taxes due in respect of the award or payment and to take such other action as may be necessary to satisfy all obligations for the payment of applicable withholding taxes. We are not required to issue any shares of common stock or otherwise settle an award under the 2016 Plan until all tax withholding obligations are satisfied.

Vote Required

Approval of the 2016 Plan requires a number of “FOR” votes that is a majority of the votes cast by the holders of our shares of common stock entitled to vote on the proposal, with abstentions counting as votes against the proposal.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval of the 2016 Plan.

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2015

2019
(PROPOSALProposal 4)

The Audit Committee, comprised of independent members of the Board of Directors, has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.2019. Shareholder ratification of the selection of Deloitte as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm is not required by the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation as amended, or Amended and Restated By-laws. The Corporation is submitting the selection of Deloitte to the shareholders for ratification because the Board of Directors considers it to be the best practice in corporate governance to do so. Even if the shareholders ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of independent accountants, the Audit Committee in its discretion may change the appointment at any time if it determines that such change would be in the best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders. If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte, the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee, but Deloitte may still be retained.

Representatives of Deloitte are expected to be in attendance at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they wish to do so and will respond to appropriate questions.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE DELOITTE RATIFICATION PROPOSAL.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2018, with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Corporation are authorized for issuance:

 

 

 

(a)

 

 

(b)

 

 

(c)

 

Plan Category

 

Number of securities to be

issued upon exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights(1)

 

 

Weighted-average exercise

price of outstanding options,

warrants and rights(2)

 

 

Number of securities

remaining available for

future issuance under equity

compensation plans

(excluding securities

reflected in column (a))

 

Equity compensation plans

   approved by security holders

 

 

904,877

 

 

$

20.54

 

 

 

740,187

 

Equity compensation plans not

   approved by security holders

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

Total

 

 

904,877

 

 

$

20.54

 

 

 

740,187

 

(1)

Includes 299,292 unvested RSUs and PSUs (assuming target performance) issued under the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

(2)

Does not reflect RSUs or PSUs included in the first column, which do not have an exercise price.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2017

2020

Any shareholder who wishes to place a proposal before the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must submit the proposal to the Corporation’s Secretary, at its executive offices, not later than November 15, 201628, 2019 to have it considered for inclusion in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting in 2017.2020.

If a shareholder otherwise wishes to propose proper business from the floor for consideration at the 20172020 Annual Meeting, the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (available on the Corporation’s website at


www.ampcopgh.com) provide that (i) the shareholder must notify the Corporation’s Secretary in writing, (ii) the shareholder’s notice must be received at the Corporation’s executive offices not earlier than January 5, 20179, 2020 and not later than February 6, 20178, 2020 and (iii) the shareholder’s notice must contain the specific information set forth in the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Bylaws. These requirements apply only to matters to be brought before the 20172020 Annual Meeting which have not been submitted for possible inclusion in the Corporation’s 20172020 proxy materials.

OTHER MATTERS

The Board of Directors does not know of any other business that will be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. Should any other matter come before the meeting, however, action may be taken thereon pursuant to proxies in the form enclosed unless discretionary authority is withheld.

AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

726 BELL AVENUE

SUITE 301

CARNEGIE, PA 15106

WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHONE

VOTING; BOTH ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK.

IF YOU CHOOSE TO CUMULATE VOTES FOR DIRECTORS YOU MUST VOTE BY MAIL.

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically viae-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE-1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone,

you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

E02587-P75615                    KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.         DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

ForWithholdFor AllTo withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
AllAllExcept
Vote on Directors

1.

Election of Directors

¨¨¨

Nominees:

01)Leonard M. Carroll
02)Laurence E. Paul
03)Ernest G. Siddons
04)J. Fredrik Strömholm
Vote on ProposalsForAgainstAbstain
2.To approve, in a non-binding vote, the compensation of the named executive officers.¨¨¨
3.To approve the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.¨¨¨
4.To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.¨¨¨
NOTE:Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” All OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1; A VOTE “FOR” ITEM 2, ITEM 3 AND ITEM 4.
All proxies heretofore given or executed with respect to the shares of stock represented by this proxy are by the filing of this proxy, expressly revoked.

To cumulate votes as to a particular nominee as explained in theProxy Statement, check box to the right, multiply the number of shares held by you by four and vote the result for the nominees listed in any proportion, then indicate the name(s) and the number of votes to be given to such nominee(s) on the reverse side of this card.Please do not check box unless you want to exercise cumulative voting.

¨

NOTE: Signature should conform exactly to name as stenciled hereon. Executors, administrators, guardians, trustees, attorneys and officers signing for a corporation should give full title. For joint accounts each owner must sign.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date


 

 


ImportantANNEX A

AMENDMENT OF
AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

The undersigned business corporation does hereby certify that:

FIRST The name of the corporation is Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation, and the Corporation’s registered office is c/o Corporation Service Company, Dauphin County:

SECOND, the Corporation was incorporated under the Act of April 29, 1874, as amended, and its date of incorporation was January 30, 1929; letters patent were issued March 19, 1929.

THIRD:That the amendment shall be effective upon filing these Articles of Amendment.

FOURTH:The amendment was duly adopted by the Corporation’s shareholders in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 1914 of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law at the Corporation’s annual meeting held on [____], 2019.

FIFTH:The amendment adopted by the Corporation is set forth in full below:

The first paragraph of Article FIFTH of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation is amended to read as follows:

“FIFTH: The authorized capital stock of the Corporation shall be 3,000,000 shares of Preference Stock, without par value, and 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the par value of $1.00 per share.”

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officer on [____], 2019.

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation

By:

Maria Trainor

Vice President, General Counsel and Secretarymportant Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of

Shareholders to be Held on May 5, 2016:

9, 2018: The Notice and Proxy Statement and the 10-K Wrap of the Corporation are available at

http://www.Ampcopittsburgh.com/financial;investors; and

The Notice and Proxy Statement and 10-K Wrap are also available at www.proxyvote.com. E37368-P03581 AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 9, 2018 10:00 A.M. The undersigned hereby appoints Maria Trainor and Michael G. McAuley and each of them, as proxies with full power of substitution to vote, as specified on the reverse side, the shares of stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, to be held at The Duquesne Club, in the Adams Room, 4th Floor, 325 Sixth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, on Wednesday, May 9, 2018, at 10:00 A.M., and any adjournments thereof. WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED: FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1 (OR, IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES, THE SHARES MAY BE VOTED CUMULATIVELY); FOR PROPOSAL 2; AND FOR PROPOSAL 3. THE PROXIES NAMED ABOVE ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE IN THEIR DISCRETION ON ANY OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. PLEASE SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE and mail in the enclosed, postage prepaid envelope. CUMULATE (If you noted cumulative voting instructions above, please check the corresponding box on the reverse side.)

 

 


 

 

E02588-P75615

WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHONE VOTING; BOTH ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK. IF YOU CHOOSE TO CUMULATE VOTES FOR DIRECTORS YOU MUST VOTE BY MAIL. VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card. AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION C/O BROADRIDGE P.O. BOX 1342 BRENTWOOD, NY 11717 TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: E64617-P18477 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLYAMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION For All Withhold All For All Except To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark "For All Except" and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. Vote on Directors 1. Election of Directors ! ! ! Nominees: 01) Elizabeth A. Fessenden 02) Terry L. Dunlap For Against Abstain Vote on Proposals ! ! ! 2. To approve an amendment to the Corporation's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation's common stock from 20,000,000 to 40,000,000 shares. ! ! ! 3. To approve, in a non-binding vote, the compensation of the named executive officers. ! ! ! 4. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2019. NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" ALL OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1; AND A VOTE "FOR" ITEM 2, ITEM 3 AND ITEM 4. All proxies heretofore given or executed with respect to the shares of stock represented by this proxy are by the filing of this proxy, expressly revoked. To cumulate votes as to a particular nominee as explained in the Proxy Statement, check box to the right, multiply the number of shares held by you by two and vote the result for the nominees listed in any proportion, then indicate the name(s) and the number of votes to be given to such nominee(s) on the reverse side of this card. Please do not check box unless you want to exercise cumulative voting. ! NOTE: Signature should conform exactly to name as stenciled hereon. Executors, administrators, guardians, trustees, attorneys and officers signing for a corporation should give full title. For joint accounts each owner must sign. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date

 

AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 5, 2016 10:00 AM

The undersigned hereby appoints Masha Trainor and Marliss Johnson and each of them, as proxies with full power of substitution to vote, as specified on the reverse side, the shares of stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, to be held at The Duquesne Club, in the Carnegie Room, 3rd Floor, 325 Sixth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, on Thursday, May 5, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., and any adjournments thereof.

WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED: FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1 (OR, IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES, THE SHARES MAY BE VOTED CUMULATIVELY); FOR PROPOSAL 2; FOR PROPOSAL 3; AND FOR PROPOSAL 4. THE PROXIES NAMED ABOVE ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE IN THEIR DISCRETION ON ANY OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING.

PLEASE SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE and mail in the enclosed, postage prepaid envelope.

CUMULATE   ____________________________________________________________________________

(If


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on May 9, 2019: The Notice and Proxy Statement and the 10-K Wrap of the Corporation are available at http://www.Ampcopittsburgh.com/investors; and The Notice and Proxy Statement and 10-K Wrap are also available at www.proxyvote.com. E64618-P18477 AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 9, 2019 10:00 A.M.  The undersigned hereby appoints Maria Trainor and Michael G. McAuley and each of them, as proxies with full power of substitution to vote, as specified on the reverse side, the shares of stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, to be held at The Duquesne Club, in the Carnegie Room, 3rd Floor, 325 Sixth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, on Thursday, May 9, 2019, at 10:00 A.M., and any adjournments thereof. WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED: FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1 (OR, IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES, THE SHARES MAY BE VOTED CUMULATIVELY); FOR PROPOSAL 2; FOR PROPOSAL 3; AND FOR PROPOSAL 4. THE PROXIES NAMED ABOVE ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE IN THEIR DISCRETION ON ANY OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. PLEASE SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE and mail in the enclosed, postage prepaid envelope. CUMULATE (If you noted cumulative voting instructions above, please check the corresponding box on the reverse side.)